[bananamango]

I respect your opinion OP, as everyone has a right to one. However, i would disagree with many of the posts in this thread. If you think weed is bad for you simply google sanjay gupta. Watch that video. He is CNN's medical adviser, and he supports cannabis.

[bananamango]

I respect your opinion OP, as everyone has a right to one. However, i would disagree with many of the posts in this thread. If you think weed is bad for you simply google sanjay gupta. Watch that video. He is CNN's medical adviser, and he supports cannabis.

[The Real Slim Shady]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

[The Real Slim Shady]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

[curtis5000]

Bro no one can tell u where weed high will take u...we all have different train of thought & with the kindda train i think ur riding now...i think it is very bad for u...am not saying it will kill u...am saying bad cos ur doing it to impress friends...average ppl who got fucked up on drugs started doing it to fit it..i call ppl like dat (I must bubble)...u sound intelligent so i think weed can work to ur advantage...but first u need to understand urself before u really get into it...ur friends smokes it & ur trying 2 keep it real...u should puff puff sometimes with dem but try not to loose urself on d process.

[curtis5000]

Bro no one can tell u where weed high will take u...we all have different train of thought & with the kindda train i think ur riding now...i think it is very bad for u...am not saying it will kill u...am saying bad cos ur doing it to impress friends...average ppl who got fucked up on drugs started doing it to fit it..i call ppl like dat (I must bubble)...u sound intelligent so i think weed can work to ur advantage...but first u need to understand urself before u really get into it...ur friends smokes it & ur trying 2 keep it real...u should puff puff sometimes with dem but try not to loose urself on d process.

[bananamango]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

I do not want to "Fight" but i believe a healthy discussion is always good. Please watch this video from a highly known doctor sanjay gupta
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/08/health/gup...marijuana/


Also check out this study done by the gov
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/12/4625608...backs.html

And if you need another link to re-affirm my opinion check out the silver haired legislation

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/oct/03...-medical-/



Once again i don't want to attack your opinion, you have the right to have it and i totally respect that. However i think some of your views are flawed. I don't think that is your own fault but because of everything people have told you.

[bananamango]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

I do not want to "Fight" but i believe a healthy discussion is always good. Please watch this video from a highly known doctor sanjay gupta
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/08/health/gup...marijuana/


Also check out this study done by the gov
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/12/4625608...backs.html

And if you need another link to re-affirm my opinion check out the silver haired legislation

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2013/oct/03...-medical-/



Once again i don't want to attack your opinion, you have the right to have it and i totally respect that. However i think some of your views are flawed. I don't think that is your own fault but because of everything people have told you.

[unnamed]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

I should have said that there is not enough evidence yet that supports it causes cancer instead of "It doesn't cause cancer".

As I said earlier I'm against smoking weed on a regular basis but it still can be used to help treat cancer or anxiety.

If however it is proved that it doesn't cause cancer it will still remain harmful for the body, in the end it's not really worth it.

[unnamed]

And there have been many studies that it doesn't cause cancer, and so far there haven't been a single person that has had cancer from weed.

You have no evidence to support that statement. cancer is a complex system and even if its never been definitively proven, there has in fact been studies that link weed to cancer. 1 study showed men under the age of 30 with Testicular Cancer were twice as likely to be regular pot smokers.

Not to mention that the same tar thats in cigarettes, long believed to be a cause of cancer, is also heavily present in weed.

But really, do you want to play russian roulette based on someone elses observations? it doesnt take a genius to figure out are bodies are not designed to consume carbon particles with other chemicals. it may or may not cause cancer specifically, but its not healthy.

I should have said that there is not enough evidence yet that supports it causes cancer instead of "It doesn't cause cancer".

As I said earlier I'm against smoking weed on a regular basis but it still can be used to help treat cancer or anxiety.

If however it is proved that it doesn't cause cancer it will still remain harmful for the body, in the end it's not really worth it.