RE: Zelensky concedes Ukraine won't join Nato 03-21-2022, 02:27 AM
#11
(03-20-2022, 05:34 PM)Boudica Wrote:(03-20-2022, 01:30 AM)Shionari Wrote:(03-20-2022, 12:19 AM)Boudica Wrote: Thanks Shionari. I appreciate your input.My pleasure ^^ I love having these discussions
(03-20-2022, 12:19 AM)Boudica Wrote: At the end of the day, he, and others in his government, chose independence as more important than the risks. I believe the stance the civilians have taken have shown they they, by a large majority, agree with this stance.
To clarify, this isn't something I've taken from news, it's because I know actual Ukrainians in real life. This has somewhat altered my viewpoint. They do a very good job of also describing the Russian perspective, which is very interesting.
Of course, without speaking to someone actually from/in Russia, it's difficult to get a fairer picture.(03-20-2022, 12:56 AM)Dismas Wrote: The narrative that Zelensky put his people in a situation they weren't happy to enter, isn't entirely true. If that were the case, his approval ratings would plummet. The opposite has happened, showing that the Ukrainian people want to remain independent of Russia. To say he shouldn't have been elected isn't fair, as he's representing his people's interests (for better or worse).I see. I hadn't really considered the fact that Ukrainians seemed to support Zelensky's decision. Perhaps it was unfair of me to judge him hastily, but I still think his decision was overall a bad one. At the end of the day, this whole conflict still hasn't led to anything that could be considered positive. Sure, people are now speaking out against Putin's brutality and dictatorship, and Ukraine has shown that it wants to obtain its independence, but that's nothing compared to the hundreds of lives that were lost in the process - at least, in my opinion. There had to have been a better way than to go through all this bloodshed.
Unlike the Ukraine, Russia is seeing signs of dissent. Over 14,000 people have been arrested for protest, and their astronauts are wearing the Ukrainian flag. The will of the people, in both Ukraine and the rest of the world, is evident.
Then again, it's still too early to say anything for certain. Maybe this will lead to new developments in the future that will justify what the Ukrainians went through. I kind of doubt it, but you never know.
@"Boudica" What did you mean by Russian perspective? I'm curious to know about that
Agreed! I was shocked it really went as far as an outright war.
I suspect no war is ever worth it, especially to those that lose someone. However, there's no country/nation that's history is free from it.
So, I'd be curious to see what Russian's themselves think about this. I'm aware thousands of their citizens have been arrested for protesting, and independent media companies are being censored. So I'm curious to see what this war would look like, from someone of a different bias to my own. What do they think of the protestors. How much do they believe the Nazi narrative?
You mention the 'Nazi narrative' which is quite interesting to me, as it seems all who support Ukraine are in fact acting just as Hitler did to the jews in the lead up to WW2.
Some interesting points:
1 - Zelensky has banned 11 political parties with ties to, or perceived ties to Russia.
My opinion: This action is what a dictator would do and is no different, in principle, to what Hitler did to the jews. IF those political parties are pro-Russia, then silencing them means you have shut down avenues of communication and diplomacy which could lead to peace. If Zelensky is serious about peace, then he should ensure political channels are left open otherwise, you ensure that the only method of response is violence.
2 - With a large part of the world condemning Putins actions, Russians living abroad have been subjected to calls of violence towards them (openly on Twitter and FB with their blessing) and having their assets frozen or taken away from them.
My opinion: In this instance, treating Russians living abroad in this way is classed as racist and xenophobic, the very things that civilised western countries proclaim they are against. Treating all people who belong to a particular group the same way is tantamount to discrimination. Why condemn every single Russian worldwide for the decisions of a few top officials in Russia?
3 - Many important positions in his cabinet have been filled by close friends of his that have no political experience. For example, Ivan Bakanov, Zelensky’s childhood friend and executive of his media business (Kvartal 95), was appointed chief of the Security Service of Ukraine. Serhiy Shefir, a former scriptwriter and producer of Kvartal 95, became chief assistant to the president. Serhiy Trofimov, former executive producer at Kvartal 95, and Yuriy Kostyuk, a former screenwriter, became deputy chiefs of the presidential office. Kvartal 95 managers were also appointed to the national TV and radio broadcasting regulator and the Anti-Monopoly Committee.
My opinion: This is a clear case of 'cronyism' and although its not the only indicator of a dictatorship, its one of the classic hallmarks. Surely I don't need to explain to you why cronyism is negative.
Furthermore, I just cannot accept that Zelensky is anything but a fool. The main reason he was elected is because he was well known through TV, he had zero political experience. Even his political party was called 'Servent of the People' which directly referenced the television series he starred in. It would be more accurate to say that the Ukrainian people voted AGAINST Poroshenko rather than voted FOR Zelensky.
I feel its fitting to refer to something Socrates said, as written by Plato, about democracy:
'In the dialogues of Plato, the founding father of Greek Philosophy – Socrates – is portrayed as hugely pessimistic about the whole business of democracy. In Book Six of The Republic, Plato describes Socrates falling into conversation with a character called Adeimantus and trying to get him to see the flaws of democracy by comparing a society to a ship. If you were heading out on a journey by sea, asks Socrates, who would you ideally want deciding who was in charge of the vessel? Just anyone or people educated in the rules and demands of seafaring? The latter of course, says Adeimantus, so why then, responds Socrates, do we keep thinking that any old person should be fit to judge who should be a ruler of a country?
Socrates’s point is that voting in an election is a skill, not a random intuition. And like any skill, it needs to be taught systematically to people. Letting the citizenry vote without an education is as irresponsible as putting them in charge of a trireme sailing to Samos in a storm.'