⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

SMTPMart - Buy Inbox SMTP | Leads | Shell | cPanel 100% Bonus on 1st deposit | Instant Refunds

ProxyByte $2/GB | Residential IPv4 - No Logs - 26M+ IPs - All unblocked

REFUNDING.GG | #1 REFUND SERVICE | SAME DAY REFUNDS | WORLDWIDE ORDERS | GET ITEMS 85% OFF

New Ownership - Policies and Changes Going Forward

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Author Message

0xDEAD10CC Offline

xor eax, eax

Ten Years of Service

Posts: 271

Threads: 17

Reputation: 0

Points: 31.75€

RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler 05-25-2019, 07:04 AM #2

Your demonstration and example of exceptions is off. You would only see that if whatever library you were using threw the appropriate exception for that kind of error. You can't really "test" C++ code like this. This isn't .NET where there is a base exception type for everything.

(This post was last modified: 05-25-2019, 07:04 AM by 0xDEAD10CC.)

Messages In This Thread

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ - by Confidential - 05-22-2019, 05:59 PM

RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - by 0xDEAD10CC - 05-25-2019, 07:04 AM

RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - by numer_05 - 06-28-2019, 04:24 PM

RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - by Drako - 06-28-2019, 07:47 PM

RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - by numer_05 - 06-28-2019, 11:38 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)