![]() |
|
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding) +--- Forum: C, C++, & Obj-C (https://sinister.ly/Forum-C-C-Obj-C) +--- Thread: ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ (/showthread.php?tid=108867) |
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ - Confidential - 05-22-2019 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - 0xDEAD10CC - 05-25-2019 Your demonstration and example of exceptions is off. You would only see that if whatever library you were using threw the appropriate exception for that kind of error. You can't really "test" C++ code like this. This isn't .NET where there is a base exception type for everything. RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - numer_05 - 06-28-2019 Doesn't g++ already tell you if you have errors? RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - Drako - 06-28-2019 (06-28-2019, 04:24 PM)numer_05 Wrote: Doesn't g++ already tell you if you have errors? As for the tool, C++ does tell you if you have an error building the program, but it doesn't tell you if it does what you want or not. Say you want to print A and you've written everything correctly and it builds, but you accidentally have a typo and it prints B. RE: [Release] [SIMPLE] Exploit/Cheat Exception Handler - numer_05 - 06-28-2019 (06-28-2019, 07:47 PM)Drako Wrote:(06-28-2019, 04:24 PM)numer_05 Wrote: Doesn't g++ already tell you if you have errors? You then go and check the code to make sure it is correct. Make a few changes and compile again. Basic troubleshooting 101. |