[Blink]

In terms of privacy and exploitability.

The most secure phone is none at all. Next comes the phones supported by the Replicant project (www.replicant.us). After that I'd say the LG Nexus 5. Lineage OS with no Google apps will be good. I did a lot of research on this phone and it doesn't appear to have bad modem isolation. I think Replicant development is a bit dead right now, which is why more devices have not been approved.

Yup, replicant seems to be outdated.

[SxTxN]

The Nokia 3310 how bout dat

[Asura]

Not too much of a phone person but I think the best security is mostly up to the one who is handling the device.

[Byrdonawire]

@Asura you are right one must ask themselves what do I want to do with my phone. If you want to use it for calls only then a flip phone will do the trick.
If you want a smart phone experience that's a whole other demon. And like you said security will then be up to the user.

[Altair]

As smartphone :
BlackBerry securest one trust me, But I don't know about BlackBerry's latest android ones

[mothered]

The Nokia 3310 how bout dat

I had one around 15 years ago and It was one of the best phones I owned at the time.

Here's some fresh news on the new 3310 release: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/0/...ease-date/

[Blink]

As smartphone :
BlackBerry securest one trust me, But I don't know about BlackBerry's latest android ones

I wouldn't trust a large private company like that.

Especially one with so much government ties.

[Hoss]

The ONLY secure phone:



It has a range of about 10-50ft depending on how loud you talk and is completely safe for young children.

[Dean Winchester]

Windows Phones. They're not open-source and hence low risks. I'm sure @mothered will vouch for this as he has been using Windows Phones too.

[Ecks]

Windows Phones. They're not open-source and hence low risks. I'm sure @mothered will vouch for this as he has been using Windows Phones too.

Didn't they cancel Windows Phone development?