[PYA]

Irrational violence is not the answer, rational violence IS.

Without armies freedoms are just social constructs, laws are just words without police to enforce them. Force it behind everything at its core. Force IS violence.

If mankind is still considering an "animal" such as a great ape, why is using violence to enforce interests inherently wrong? Why can it not be rationalized that humans, are animals. as animals we use violence, we are the only species to enforce what is seen as :"the rule of law".

From your perspective. Is this wrong if not/so, why?

[zyeAL6]

Life itself is based on power projection aka violence.

For anyone curious on exploring this matter, Jason Lowery of the US Space Force goes in depth in this podcast: https://whatismoneypodcast.com/episodes/...e-1-wim124

[UnlimitedDesk]

The supposed difference between humans and animals is our ability to reason, and think and stuff, but I really don't think we do a good enough job at it.
I wouldn't say violence is the answer, but it's what has been chosen by every single generation of human beings. Hopefully one day we get passed that.

[JohnnyDangerously]

Definitely being angry not good for ones health, but theres always a time and a place.