[yokai]

But if you increase the radius of something it will make it bigger, not more of a circle?

When adding radius to a square you round out the corners, the more radius the rounder the corners. This is whats referred to as; "corner radius".

[Jebusfathead]

But if you increase the radius of something it will make it bigger, not more of a circle?

When adding radius to a square you round out the corners, the more radius the rounder the corners. This is whats referred to as; "corner radius".

Ohhhhh corner radius, I thought you just meant as in radius from the sides or to the corner part, not the actual rounding on the corners. I get you now

[Falcon_mybb_import25675]

They're a nice design. Well done!

[Theós]

That's the idea! @3 had a point because a lot of forums use circle flat minimum designs.

And yet you used that idea, claiming it to be unique when I stated it wasn't. That being said, I have a few complaints regarding these new ones.

• The radius is a tad too big, its coming closer to being a circle than a square. 
  
• The spacing between the border and icons are too small.
  
• Don't dull the colors, if they look like a DC movie then no one would want to attain them.
  

---

I like I mentioned I honestly don't know, just wanted to showcase an idea, I didn't have a set description for them

If you fail to show what an icon is suppose to represent then the icon is terribly made. It has one job, showcase a specific message.

Lol @12 You always have something to say

[Zodiac]

These look great. Much better than the standard circle ones. Keep it up pal.

[Zephyrus]

I love how simple they look

[yokai]

I love how simple they look

They look like badly cropped, pre-made icons that were added in a unrefined shape. (Which is what they are.) The random change in style from the background to the icons is a bit... Drastic.

---

Lol @12 You always have something to say

Not that it is needed, as I've already given you a complete run down on why icons such as these are downright awful to look at in the past.

[Theós]

I love how simple they look

They look like badly cropped, pre-made icons that were added in a unrefined shape. (Which is what they are.) The random change in style from the background to the icons is a bit... Drastic.

---

Lol @12 You always have something to say

Not that it is needed, as I've already given you a complete run down on why icons such as these are downright awful to look at in the past.

Well, I guess they're awful lol

[Red_mybb_import25644]

Not that it is needed, as I've already given you a complete run down on why icons such as these are downright awful to look at in the past.

Go create some Icons yourself so we can see how godly yours are if these are so awful.

[yokai]

Go create some Icons yourself so we can see how godly yours are if these are so awful.

That logic is as faulty as the "ABC" logic. First of all, while design is subjective, it is also a fair deal of "objective". For example, icons must be easy to understand, give the specific message they aim to do and follow at least one form of design language. (If it follow two or more then for god sake don't use two that contradict each other like these icons do.) Furthermore, design should also not use other's work without permission and I am having a slightly hard time believing that the icons that were used in making these are also made by @10 and that they aren't just cropped assets.