Login Register


Rule Ammendment filter_list
Author
Message
Rule Ammendment #1
Should the rules be amended to prohibit advertising referrer-based moneymaking scams?
[Image: 7ajmN5P.jpg]

Telegram: Oni_SL (Link)


RE: Rule Ammendment #2
Assuming you're talking about links where the OP wants people to be referred by him/her then no, but I do think that they need a mandatory non-refer link as well.
So a normal link and a refer link to possibly thank the OP for the contribution, assuming that's what you're talking about.
[Image: 17468445120140919161136067.gif]


RE: Rule Ammendment #3
Yes. Almost all posts regarding anything about referrals are LQ and useless to everyone that falls in the pyramid scheme.


RE: Rule Ammendment #4
If referrals =/= scams, you should not ban them on the basis of referrals = scams because that's how it is MOST of the time.


RE: Rule Ammendment #5
(05-26-2016, 09:42 PM)Primitive Wrote: If referrals =/= scams, you should not ban them on the basis of referrals = scams because that's how it is MOST of the time.

Then just let him/the other staff look over it?


RE: Rule Ammendment #6
yes because 6 seconds of my time is worth more than half a cent
Oh shit whaddup!
[Image: s6fDTrF.png]


RE: Rule Ammendment #7
(05-27-2016, 03:17 AM)typhoid Wrote: yes because 6 seconds of my time is worth more than half a cent

Please don't joke around about how much you're worth.


RE: Rule Ammendment #8
(05-27-2016, 03:25 AM)Primitive Wrote: Please don't joke around about how much you're worth.

ill let you know when im joking
Oh shit whaddup!
[Image: s6fDTrF.png]

[+] 1 user Likes typhoid's post

RE: Rule Ammendment #9
I'm in favor of prohibiting this.
[Image: JchOGM.png]


RE: Rule Ammendment #10
Have a specific section for it maybe? A referral section. Anyone who just spams a referral link in other sections deserves a punishment.
[Image: dHJ4Beo.gif]
Hidden Lesson: Reactions are always instinctive whereas responses are always well thought of.








Users browsing this thread: