(07-31-2016, 07:19 PM)Primitive Wrote: (07-31-2016, 07:14 PM)Jiggly Wrote: If somebody was consistently top poster for a few months, perhaps an award would be in order.
>Primitive<
OH GUYS, YOU DON'T HAVE TO PRETEND LIKE I'M NOT HERE C'MON BE PROUD OF ME
What, you, the shitposter they're worried about?
Nah, you're a mixed bag. Sometimes you post pretty good stuff and sometimes you're a bloody pain xD
(07-31-2016, 07:53 PM)Manny Wrote: (07-31-2016, 07:14 PM)Jiggly Wrote: If somebody was consistently top poster for a few months, perhaps an award would be in order. I'm mostly concerned with the danger of somebody stopping after the received an award. Staff would need to keep an eye on shitposting anyway.
This!
This is an okay I think.
But awards for top posters each month. All you'll see is shit posts just like other forums.
True, but then that would be mean staff weren't doing their jobs. I believe awards should be a case by case basis. Some people top post for a few weeks then disappear off the face of the earth. Whereas some will hit top several times every few months for 3 years straight.