[Red_mybb_import25644]

Sorry i did not understand due to the grammar, can you re-frase this?

Even though my grammar is dreadful it's rather easy to understand lol

I really don't... Sorry.

ahhh fine wait until i wake up and stop drinking

[Jebusfathead]

Sorry i did not understand due to the grammar, can you re-frase this?

Even though my grammar is dreadful it's rather easy to understand lol

I really don't... Sorry.

ahhh fine wait until i wake up and stop drinking

I'll rephrase it for you once my PC slowly loads up

---

Ok here's the original


'Took my word right out of my mouth, It may seem to be rapidly progressing but there will be speed bumps if you will that will prolong the time it takes to do things say like animals/humans/larger objects etc. Also sure it copies atoms over well it teleports to another place, but if you can lose packet data with computers and information along the way wouldn't this also be the same with say humans? What happens if we lose a few atoms on the way or even a few of the protons/neutrons or electrons that make up our atoms.'


Now for my re-phrasing.

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

[Red_mybb_import25644]

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

ily <3

[Rikka]

Sorry i did not understand due to the grammar, can you re-frase this?

Even though my grammar is dreadful it's rather easy to understand lol

I really don't... Sorry.

ahhh fine wait until i wake up and stop drinking

I'll rephrase it for you once my PC slowly loads up

---

Ok here's the original


'Took my word right out of my mouth, It may seem to be rapidly progressing but there will be speed bumps if you will that will prolong the time it takes to do things say like animals/humans/larger objects etc. Also sure it copies atoms over well it teleports to another place, but if you can lose packet data with computers and information along the way wouldn't this also be the same with say humans? What happens if we lose a few atoms on the way or even a few of the protons/neutrons or electrons that make up our atoms.'


Now for my re-phrasing.

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

Well, with more studies in understanding the waves with the quantum particles, they'll have to figure out why before they try on bigger objects & animal tests such as bugs etc, but it's not so far away as you think, i've researched this alot lately & they're starting to figure some deep shit out right now, so wait a few years & you'll see they know why the atoms doesn't copy correctly & they'll probably fix the issue before even thinking of living experiment... But it's not so far away from success

[Jebusfathead]

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

ily <3

Even though my grammar is dreadful it's rather easy to understand lol

I really don't... Sorry.

ahhh fine wait until i wake up and stop drinking

I'll rephrase it for you once my PC slowly loads up

---

Ok here's the original


'Took my word right out of my mouth, It may seem to be rapidly progressing but there will be speed bumps if you will that will prolong the time it takes to do things say like animals/humans/larger objects etc. Also sure it copies atoms over well it teleports to another place, but if you can lose packet data with computers and information along the way wouldn't this also be the same with say humans? What happens if we lose a few atoms on the way or even a few of the protons/neutrons or electrons that make up our atoms.'


Now for my re-phrasing.

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

Well, with more studies in understanding the waves with the quantum particles, they'll have to figure out why before they try on bigger objects & animal tests such as bugs etc, but it's not so far away as you think, i've researched this alot lately & they're starting to figure some deep shit out right now, so wait a few years & you'll see they know why the atoms doesn't copy correctly & they'll probably fix the issue before even thinking of living experiment... But it's not so far away from success

Yea but if you think about it they still haven't permanently solved packet loss in like, loads of years, so it will have a way to go with quantum physics, especially if lives are involved. Not to mention ethics like if you teleported a live person are they really the same person they was before?

[Kayo]

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

ily <3

I really don't... Sorry.

ahhh fine wait until i wake up and stop drinking

I'll rephrase it for you once my PC slowly loads up

---

Ok here's the original


'Took my word right out of my mouth, It may seem to be rapidly progressing but there will be speed bumps if you will that will prolong the time it takes to do things say like animals/humans/larger objects etc. Also sure it copies atoms over well it teleports to another place, but if you can lose packet data with computers and information along the way wouldn't this also be the same with say humans? What happens if we lose a few atoms on the way or even a few of the protons/neutrons or electrons that make up our atoms.'


Now for my re-phrasing.

'That's exactly what I was going to say, it might be going fast now, but it will slow down at certain stages where they will find problems hard to fix. For example teleporting things such as humans, animals or larger objects compared to just 1 photon. We lose data packets on computers when they send files all the time and it's not entirely understood why. So what if the same happens when we teleport a person, for example I teleport to Canada for a holiday but some of my atoms don't copy correctly so I don't have a leg.'

Well, with more studies in understanding the waves with the quantum particles, they'll have to figure out why before they try on bigger objects & animal tests such as bugs etc, but it's not so far away as you think, i've researched this alot lately & they're starting to figure some deep shit out right now, so wait a few years & you'll see they know why the atoms doesn't copy correctly & they'll probably fix the issue before even thinking of living experiment... But it's not so far away from success

Yea but if you think about it they still haven't permanently solved packet loss in like, loads of years, so it will have a way to go with quantum physics, especially if lives are involved. Not to mention ethics like if you teleported a live person are they really the same person they was before?

There is one fix I can think of. Probably not as simple as it seems but using something much like a "middle man" of sorts. So lets say it's a two tier system now. As @5 said once all photons are replicated the original must be destroyed... Hmm well what if instead just skipping straight to such there were to be a "checkpoint" of sorts. All information could be sent to the first area. From there the stage would take two sets of data. One that reads purely the original (possibly multiple times and one that reads the replicated data set. They would all then be compared. If the duplicated data were to not match up with the original it would be recopied. So in terms of packet loss however.... This may still have a few bugs... There are many possible fixes however. Lets say before replicating and sending the data there would be a system in place that counts the atoms and protons etc of the original version(possibly multiple). The middle stage would only accept the data that completes the number of such of the original copy. There could be a system that counts each number of specific tissues, cells and so on and then later break them down into specific types of atoms that contain so many rings of protons and electrons or so on and that would create one group. Every bit with the same structure would be classified into that group. Once done continuously they may be all grouped. (I'm not no physicist correct me if I'm wrong) From What I understand there are only a certain amount of structures before such are replicated or repeated. So the middle point would only accept data that matches all the original scans. If one is off it could retry. With this system it wouldn't have as high of a possibility of completely failing. There would still be loop holes somewhere in that but everything has a solution.

[Cloud_mybb_import25633]

Well it's already being researched a lot for things like quantum computers.

Yepp, quantum clouds is expected to be released later this year or 2017-2018, so it will be a dope experience

hehe, quantum clouds. hehehe. Clouds rule the world.

[Kayo]

Well it's already being researched a lot for things like quantum computers.

Yepp, quantum clouds is expected to be released later this year or 2017-2018, so it will be a dope experience

hehe, quantum clouds. hehehe. Clouds rule the world.

@6 rules @11's ;o