[BlueScreen]

I don't quite understand your posts, they contrast against each other.



First you're saying you can't change, because its how you're born, then you're saying you want to change, then you say you have changed.



Regardless of what you mean, my belief is that they need to be kept away from society and children until they are successfully rehabilitated. Meaning the child molesting ones, not the harmless ones.

>implying i actually touched that girl, and didnt just post that text to piss of breshie.

[Satan]

>implying i actually touched that girl, and didnt just post that text to piss of breshie.

I'm not quite sure I understand what you are talking about, I'm not implying anything about you beyond that which you have stated, which opposes itself.

[BlueScreen]

I'm not quite sure I understand what you are talking about, I'm not implying anything about you beyond that which you have stated, which opposes itself.

Oh. You must be new around here. Sowwi bby, but Im having a really shitty week and I cant seem to be able to concentrate.

[Mom]

I'm not quite sure I understand what you are talking about, I'm not implying anything about you beyond that which you have stated, which opposes itself.

">Implying" is moreso a joking way of explaining something or preemptively answering a question that has not been asked. Rarely an actual accusation of implication.

[Satan]

Oh. You must be new around here. Sowwi bby, but Im having a really shitty week and I cant seem to be able to concentrate.

If you're referencing the Skype thing, I registered shortly before that, and nobody has added me to that group chat, so I was clueless as to what happened, and didn't know what it entailed.

[Adorapuff]

I got a question for you bluescreen. You say you are an ex-pedo and can't change the past. Does that mean you no longer have sexual attraction towards small girls? Also, find little children adorable is not pedophilic. I'm quite confused about you. Also, what age did you realize your a pedo?

[Satan]

">Implying" is moreso a joking way of explaining something or preemptively answering a question that has not been asked. Rarely an actual accusation of implication.

Ah. Greentext bullshit always is confusing.

[BlueScreen]

I got a question for you bluescreen. You say you are an ex-pedo and can't change the past. Does that mean you no longer have sexual attraction towards small girls? Also, find little children adorable is not pedophilic. I'm quite confused about you. Also, what age did you realize your a pedo?

Bluescreeny does still find little girls somewhat attractive, which is why I said '(ex-)pedophile' rather than just ex pedophile. I would say I first found out I was into little girls after a day of playing with the first graders at my old school at around age 13-14.

[Mom]

Bluescreeny does still find little girls somewhat attractive, which is why I said '(ex-)pedophile' rather than just ex pedophile. I would say I first found out I was into little girls after a day of playing with the first graders at my old school at around age 13-14.

I'm more astonished by the honesty than the actual content of information.

This is why I love you Bluey. You know when not to lie. <3

[Uzinero]

My views are essentially the same as Bluescreen's on this one, though I don't find any attraction to minors.
The way I see it they can't change who they're attracted too, and so they shouldn't be thought poorly off or criticized and treated like shit if they haven't actually done anything just because of who they find attractive.