(09-11-2013, 05:49 AM)d3m0nyx Wrote: Im confused. Is this your statement or someone elses?
If it is yours it's asinine to think they released the chemicals unprovoked. Syria knew they had pressure from the U.N, they even threatened to counter-attack if a strike was made. To say that they released them unprovoked is just ignorant.
Yours should have no apostrophe, however it's does, being a compact 'It Is'.
------
Basically what you're saying is that they attracted as much attention as they could from the U.N. ( Since threats tend to do that nicely ) and then when the threat is executed, say it wasn't them, since they tried to blame it on the rebels. I'm sorry, but the logic there is bizarre to say the least, and if I'm expected that that's the story and nothing more, I think you can see why that doesn't exactly roll well.
It comes down to two things:
1: The head of Syria is a child of 7 years old who breaks a vase in plain sight and screams "It wasn't me!".
2: There's something I'm completely unaware of that could put everything together which your post did not provide, because, while calling me ignorant and asinine is cute, your post really didn't change much in my perspective. We can be
civilized and not call eachother names and you can enlighten me as to how I'm wrong.
Or:
You can be sour, fling insults, and no one gets out of this smarter.
I am completely open to the option that I'm wrong, that I have the wrong idea, and Hell, that I may not have everything put together right, but in MY perspective, your post didn't help in any realizations.