+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) (/Thread-Obama-starts-world-war-3-9-11-13)
Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Imada Duty - 09-09-2013
I'm new to this site. It seems legit so I thought I would start with a prophecy. On Tuesday every station in the world will be playing a press conference in which president Obama will announce a strike on Syria. He's not going to wait for congressional approval, he doesn't care that less then 1/4 of house member disapprove, he needs this to take minds off his political deficiency. He will be remembered for Syria not his short falls.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - w00t - 09-09-2013
Kso, one-by-one on your mental theory.
Every station in the world? Not everyone cares what the US is doing.
He doesn't have to wait for congressional approval for a military action, he's the elected head of the military. All congress would be needed for is a declaration of war, which no one wants.
What political deficiencies? Remind me again, what part of the political process does the US give their president? Oh, that's right, the military.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Dismas - 09-09-2013
(09-09-2013, 07:00 AM)w00t Wrote: Kso, one-by-one on your mental theory.
Every station in the world? Not everyone cares what the US is doing.
He doesn't have to wait for congressional approval for a military action, he's the elected head of the military. All congress would be needed for is a declaration of war, which no one wants.
What political deficiencies? Remind me again, what part of the political process does the US give their president? Oh, that's right, the military.
It's sad, but true. He's the commander-in-chief.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Mom - 09-10-2013
I would only consider the saddest part to be that people are apparently assuming ( which, ironically, I'm assuming from the first post ) that:
1: This will cause World War 3 (It MIGHT be big, but not global, you're being silly).
2: That the president is doing this to save face from political troubles of sorts. Even a baby knows that wouldn't work. The main reason he's doing this is because, y'know, a chemical weapon has been released, and the only reason Syria has allies is through financial ties, which aren't too strong when facing what could be a crippling war (which has slim chances of happening anyways).
3: That you're an oracle. I don't want to start bad blood or step on anyones toes, but you can't just go around predicting things with absolute confidence without any evidence besides your personal assumptions.
That's my two cents at least. All opinionated if it makes anyone feel better.
Also it's Tuesday. Sun's still shining and it ain't raining bombs. Check mate?
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Imada Duty - 09-11-2013
really thought this would get more of a resposne but hey take what you can get. i made a reply to the earlier comment but the mod so graciously deleteted it.
as for black river the result of military actionby the us will envoke a world conflict. the pm in russia doesnt want a war and if obama actions creeate a global threat ( weaponized disease that will carry from airport to airport in a matter of days.) when syria releases these weapons because of us interaction other countries willl not be happy. its like when someone knows there going to die they want to take as many people with as possible.thats what syria is doing.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Mom - 09-11-2013
Your point is moot, at least the point I understand, since Syria released the chemicals unprovoked from anyone. hell, no one knew what was going on. So Syria alone is the global threat following your logic.
If you could put more effort into your grammar and punctuation, I'd probably understand more, sorry.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - d3m0nyx - 09-11-2013
(09-11-2013, 04:22 AM)Black River Wrote: Your point is moot, at least the point I understand, since Syria released the chemicals unprovoked from anyone. hell, no one knew what was going on. So Syria alone is the global threat following your logic.
Im confused. Is this your statement or someone elses?
If it is your's its asinine to think they released the chemicals unprovoked. Syria knew they had pressure from the U.N, they even threatened to counterattack if a strike was made. To say that they released them unprovoked is just ignorant.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - w00t - 09-11-2013
(09-11-2013, 04:18 AM)Imada Duty Wrote: really thought this would get more of a resposne but hey take what you can get. i made a reply to the earlier comment but the mod so graciously deleteted it.
as for black river the result of military actionby the us will envoke a world conflict. the pm in russia doesnt want a war and if obama actions creeate a global threat ( weaponized disease that will carry from airport to airport in a matter of days.) when syria releases these weapons because of us interaction other countries willl not be happy. its like when someone knows there going to die they want to take as many people with as possible.thats what syria is doing.
You're equivocating stockpiled chemical armaments all supplied by mother Russia to weaponized disease. Odds are much greater that the people of Syria have some unwieldy flu than that they have a stockpile of weaponized disease.
Russia doesn't want a war, the US doesn't want a war. Conveniently, bombing chemical weapons depots and disabling a few military bases isn't an act of war under international law.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - Mom - 09-11-2013
(09-11-2013, 05:49 AM)d3m0nyx Wrote: Im confused. Is this your statement or someone elses?Yours should have no apostrophe, however it's does, being a compact 'It Is'.
If it is yours it's asinine to think they released the chemicals unprovoked. Syria knew they had pressure from the U.N, they even threatened to counter-attack if a strike was made. To say that they released them unprovoked is just ignorant.
------
Basically what you're saying is that they attracted as much attention as they could from the U.N. ( Since threats tend to do that nicely ) and then when the threat is executed, say it wasn't them, since they tried to blame it on the rebels. I'm sorry, but the logic there is bizarre to say the least, and if I'm expected that that's the story and nothing more, I think you can see why that doesn't exactly roll well.
It comes down to two things:
1: The head of Syria is a child of 7 years old who breaks a vase in plain sight and screams "It wasn't me!".
2: There's something I'm completely unaware of that could put everything together which your post did not provide, because, while calling me ignorant and asinine is cute, your post really didn't change much in my perspective. We can be civilized and not call eachother names and you can enlighten me as to how I'm wrong.
Or:
You can be sour, fling insults, and no one gets out of this smarter.
I am completely open to the option that I'm wrong, that I have the wrong idea, and Hell, that I may not have everything put together right, but in MY perspective, your post didn't help in any realizations.
RE: Obama starts world war 3(9/11/13) - TheGreek - 10-03-2013
Well I hope there won't be a war.I was hoping to join the military,it would a hell of a bad timing...