Login Register


My wish for RF ! filter_list
Author
Message
RE: My wish for RF ! #11
Oh man we'd have so much fun if that was the current activity.
[Image: WWYf1H4.png]

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #12
(11-05-2015, 07:17 AM)Claw Wrote: I really hope this forum grows as well.

I"ll personally start advertising.

(11-05-2015, 07:35 AM)Bond Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 07:17 AM)Claw Wrote: I really hope this forum grows as well.

I"ll personally start advertising.

I'm already doing and i have got 14 refferals.

I have done a lot of advertising in the past, but never used my ref link. I have probably gotten about 50 refs right now though Tongue if I had shared my ref link that is.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #13
Hello guys I'm new here Biggrin looks like a nice forum~

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #14
(11-05-2015, 01:11 PM)Skiddie Wrote: Hello guys I'm new here Biggrin looks like a nice forum~

Welcome!
Your post would fit better in the introductions subforum.
Whoop Whoop?

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #15
I love how you tagged them and not me.

And what would be the point?

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #16
(11-05-2015, 01:46 PM)Andrew Wrote: I love how you tagged them and not me.

And what would be the point?

What do you mean would not be the point
Whoop Whoop?

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #17
(11-05-2015, 01:49 PM)Pirate Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 01:46 PM)Andrew Wrote: I love how you tagged them and not me.

And what would be the point?

What do you mean would not be the point

What?

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #18
(11-05-2015, 02:03 PM)Andrew Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 01:49 PM)Pirate Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 01:46 PM)Andrew Wrote: I love how you tagged them and not me.

And what would be the point?

What do you mean would not be the point

What?

You don't want rf to have more activity?
Whoop Whoop?

Reply

RE: My wish for RF ! #19
(11-05-2015, 02:19 PM)Pirate Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 02:03 PM)Andrew Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 01:49 PM)Pirate Wrote:
(11-05-2015, 01:46 PM)Andrew Wrote: I love how you tagged them and not me.

And what would be the point?

What do you mean would not be the point

What?

You don't want rf to have more activity?

:rly: I never said that. Nor did I imply that.

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)