Login Register






Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


My illustrations filter_list
Author
Message
RE: My illustrations #31
(08-20-2016, 09:21 PM)Sober Wrote: Not taking cancerous idiotic pricks in to count.

Then in all honesty, you shouldn't take this guy into account. He was stealing designs (from Google no doubt) and after proving it, his only defense was, and I quote;

Quote:You are assuming I got these content from these links.

I never got them from there. You never saw me work on these projects so how are you going to know what I was doing to make these.

While the work in question was a copy/paste of Google's Material Icon for Camera Apps. (Along with others. Including stocks used without a proper license). Ironically, he also stole another icon use on OSX. The majority of his work was a stock he didn't make, nor had the license to write off as his own, with another stock over and a filter effect on it. Yet he claimed it to be without a doubt his work, the above being his only defense on the matter. These illustrations that were posted here on this thread was original as far as I can see. Though when  he was given a tip on how to up the quality of them in terms of resolution, he outright refused to listen because he "without a doubt" seems to know better than anyone.

Reply

RE: My illustrations #32
(08-20-2016, 09:28 PM)Crovus Wrote:
(08-20-2016, 09:21 PM)Sober Wrote: Not taking cancerous idiotic pricks in to count.

Then in all honesty, you shouldn't take this guy into account. He was stealing designs (from Google no doubt) and after proving it, his only defense was, and I quote;

Quote:You are assuming I got these content from these links.

I never got them from there. You never saw me work on these projects so how are you going to know what I was doing to make these.

While the work in question was a copy/paste of Google's Material Icon for Camera Apps. (Along with others. Including stocks used without a proper license). Ironically, he also stole another icon use on OSX. The majority of his work was a stock he didn't make, nor had the license to write off as his own, with another stock over and a filter effect on it. Yet he claimed it to be without a doubt his work, the above being his only defense on the matter. These illustrations that were posted here on this thread was original as far as I can see. Though when  he was given a tip on how to up the quality of them in terms of resolution, he outright refused to listen because he "without a doubt" seems to know better than anyone.

Alright, I see what you're coming from. And I am no one to support plagiarism. But, I'm not going to take any sides, I will stand by my earlier statement.
[Image: MgAlee1.gif]
You are a little soul, carrying around a corpse.


Reply

RE: My illustrations #33
(08-20-2016, 09:35 PM)Sober Wrote: Alright, I see what you're coming from. And I am no one to support plagiarism. But, I'm not going to take any sides, I will stand by my earlier statement.

Neither am I. Though something is what it is, had he admitted it and taken some advice then I wouldn't bat an eye. The fact that he didn't however, further "prove" that statement of being idiotic.

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)