[S3xySmurf]

There so many security fails in this video, its unreal Tom writes all his passwords on tiny pieces of paper, good ...

Are we going backwards in regards to security rather than forwards?

[mothered]

As with all accounts and devices, biometric authentication will also have recovery options In case of failure. So ultimately, It's the recovery credentials protecting the account/device and not biometrics.

Interesting viewing pertaining to online accounts and number of passwords used. A few years ago, I performed my very own research on a random user and his accounts. After a few weeks of testing and compromising, I Identified that he'd used the same login credentials (email:pass) for 30+ accounts.

Users are becoming more and more complacent with their online habits and as such, security (client-side) will continue to decline.

[Blink]

After 8 billion there was a high pitch noise that makes me want to punch the creator of the video.
Why on earth would someone put that noise in there... "Let's add a really annoying noise into a video that is supposed to get us customers"...

Anyways, the part where they went wrong is that you can't memorize passwords. You can, and they can still be secure, if you come up with something good enough...
There's multiple ways to go about this, so I won't go into it.

Biometrics aren't entirely secure either, no usable system is secure. In one of the examples, a women had her credit card stolen, or account hacked neither have much to do with passwords. Accounts are often hacked using phishing or MITM techniques (the latter is becoming increasingly rare), and credit cards can be stolen in many ways that have absolutely nothing to do with passwords.

Overall, I've seen worse, but this could've been better.

[S3xySmurf]

After 8 billion there was a high pitch noise that makes me want to punch the creator of the video.
Why on earth would someone put that noise in there... "Let's add a really annoying noise into a video that is supposed to get us customers"...

Anyways, the part where they went wrong is that you can't memorize passwords.  You can, and they can still be secure, if you come up with something good enough...
There's multiple ways to go about this, so I won't go into it.

Biometrics aren't entirely secure either, no usable system is secure.  In one of the examples, a women had her credit card stolen, or account hacked neither have much to do with passwords.  Accounts are often hacked using phishing or MITM techniques (the latter is becoming increasingly rare), and credit cards can be stolen in many ways that have absolutely nothing to do with passwords.

Overall, I've seen worse, but this could've been better.

The noise is supposed to be a form of mind control that turns your mind into mush so you buy their products without realizing what happened.

[Mom]

As with all accounts and devices, biometric authentication will also have recovery options In case of failure. So ultimately, It's the recovery credentials protecting the account/device and not biometrics.

Interesting viewing pertaining to online accounts and number of passwords used. A few years ago, I performed my very own research on a random user and his accounts. After a few weeks of testing and compromising, I Identified that he'd used the same login credentials (email:pass) for 30+ accounts.

Users are becoming more and more complacent with their online habits and as such, security (client-side) will continue to decline.

You seem extremely adept in this sort of thing and I was beginning to grow curious as to your methods and how you use them, assuming you're even willing to share them. I'd understand why not if otherwise.

After 8 billion there was a high pitch noise that makes me want to punch the creator of the video.
Why on earth would someone put that noise in there... "Let's add a really annoying noise into a video that is supposed to get us customers"...

Anyways, the part where they went wrong is that you can't memorize passwords. You can, and they can still be secure, if you come up with something good enough...
There's multiple ways to go about this, so I won't go into it.

Biometrics aren't entirely secure either, no usable system is secure. In one of the examples, a women had her credit card stolen, or account hacked neither have much to do with passwords. Accounts are often hacked using phishing or MITM techniques (the latter is becoming increasingly rare), and credit cards can be stolen in many ways that have absolutely nothing to do with passwords.

Overall, I've seen worse, but this could've been better.

The noise is supposed to be a form of mind control that turns your mind into mush so you buy their products without realizing what happened.

Jokes on them. I don't have a brain.

[S3xySmurf]

As with all accounts and devices, biometric authentication will also have recovery options In case of failure. So ultimately, It's the recovery credentials protecting the account/device and not biometrics.

Interesting viewing pertaining to online accounts and number of passwords used. A few years ago, I performed my very own research on a random user and his accounts. After a few weeks of testing and compromising, I Identified that he'd used the same login credentials (email:pass) for 30+ accounts.

Users are becoming more and more complacent with their online habits and as such, security (client-side) will continue to decline.

You seem extremely adept in this sort of thing and I was beginning to grow curious as to your methods and how you use them, assuming you're even willing to share them. I'd understand why not if otherwise.

After 8 billion there was a high pitch noise that makes me want to punch the creator of the video.
Why on earth would someone put that noise in there... "Let's add a really annoying noise into a video that is supposed to get us customers"...

Anyways, the part where they went wrong is that you can't memorize passwords.  You can, and they can still be secure, if you come up with something good enough...
There's multiple ways to go about this, so I won't go into it.

Biometrics aren't entirely secure either, no usable system is secure.  In one of the examples, a women had her credit card stolen, or account hacked neither have much to do with passwords.  Accounts are often hacked using phishing or MITM techniques (the latter is becoming increasingly rare), and credit cards can be stolen in many ways that have absolutely nothing to do with passwords.

Overall, I've seen worse, but this could've been better.

The noise is supposed to be a form of mind control that turns your mind into mush so you buy their products without realizing what happened.

Jokes on them. I don't have a brain.

Mothered is extremely adept in logging into places he shouldn't it's actually quite scary to think this guy can log in to most places and that's with security in place, I wish he would pass on what he knows and how he thinks but he is a good guy so no worries there unless you get on his dark side.

[mothered]

You seem extremely adept in this sort of thing and I was beginning to grow curious as to your methods and how you use them, assuming you're even willing to share them. I'd understand why not if otherwise.

There's so many facets of Cyber security, and even more so the number of methodologies used to circumvent basically any security measure In place.

As I've mentioned many times In various threads, It's a lot more difficult from a security standpoint- you need to Identify and secure every vulnerability, however from both a technical and social engineering viewpoint, It's simply not possible. From a hacker's perspective, all that's required Is a single vulnerable gateway and they're In. As such, documenting methods and the like, Is beyond the scope of this post.

[Mom]

You seem extremely adept in this sort of thing and I was beginning to grow curious as to your methods and how you use them, assuming you're even willing to share them. I'd understand why not if otherwise.

There's so many facets of Cyber security, and even more so the number of methodologies used to circumvent basically any security measure In place.

As I've mentioned many times In various threads, It's a lot more difficult from a security standpoint- you need to Identify and secure every vulnerability, however from both a technical and social engineering viewpoint, It's simply not possible. From a hacker's perspective, all that's required Is a single vulnerable gateway and they're In. As such, documenting methods and the like, Is beyond the scope of this post.

I can only imagine. I was never under the illusion that you'd be able to divulge nearly enough information in a thread, let alone a single one off post. This was more my asking if you'd like to open a discussion with me about the subject some time around.

[mothered]

I can only imagine. I was never under the illusion that you'd be able to divulge nearly enough information in a thread, let alone a single one off post. This was more my asking if you'd like to open a discussion with me about the subject some time around.

The nature and sensitivity of what's Involved, Is quite serious and punishable on a federal level.

As you can appreciate, my anonymity Is paramount and (nothing personal to yourself), I don't discuss anything other than what I see fit on this board.

[Mom]

I can only imagine. I was never under the illusion that you'd be able to divulge nearly enough information in a thread, let alone a single one off post. This was more my asking if you'd like to open a discussion with me about the subject some time around.

The nature and sensitivity of what's Involved, Is quite serious and punishable on a federal level.

As you can appreciate, my anonymity Is paramount and (nothing personal to yourself), I don't discuss anything other than what I see fit on this board.

I expected as much, but y'can't blame the small folk for trying. I appreciate you letting me down easy though.