Login Register


Kid swatted over Call Of Duty filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #31
(04-29-2014, 04:14 AM)w00t Wrote: Because you don't hear about it.


I highly doubt any legal reprecussions will occur. Easy for the agressor to provide reasonable doubt.

I meant people actually KILLING someone over the internet(like hiring hitmen, or just some fucking weird crazy guy killing someone by picking out a random dox and going over there and murdering them)

You'd surely hear about it.
Unleash the lead from my pistol into my head bumpin' crystal

Reply

Re: RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #32
(04-29-2014, 09:46 PM)Kosaki Wrote: I meant people actually KILLING someone over the internet(like hiring hitmen, or just some fucking weird crazy guy killing someone by picking out a random dox and going over there and murdering them)

You'd surely hear about it.

Thing is, there is. SR2 had that going on. The creator even tried hiring someone to bump off someone who was trying to blackmail him.
telegram: @satan_sl

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #33
(04-30-2014, 12:07 AM)Six Wrote: Thing is, there is. SR2 had that going on. The creator even tried hiring someone to bump off someone who was trying to blackmail him.

Yes, but the hit never happened. I know there are people who try hiring hitmen to kill people from off the Deepweb, but how many of those have been successful? How many are just law enforcement posing as them? How many are just people that take your 10k and leave?
Unleash the lead from my pistol into my head bumpin' crystal

Reply

Re: RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #34
(04-30-2014, 12:17 AM)Kosaki Wrote: Yes, but the hit never happened. I know there are people who try hiring hitmen to kill people from off the Deepweb, but how many of those have been successful? How many are just law enforcement posing as them? How many are just people that take your 10k and leave?

If it were successful, as a hitman, you wouldn't hear it as being a hired hitman unless it was done to draw attention. Probably half @ police. Probably less than half @ scammers.

Criminals have at least some honour in their word.
telegram: @satan_sl

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #35
(04-29-2014, 09:46 PM)Kosaki Wrote: I meant people actually KILLING someone over the internet(like hiring hitmen, or just some fucking weird crazy guy killing someone by picking out a random dox and going over there and murdering them)

You'd surely hear about it.

In what world does it make sense to you that the kind of person with the resources to reach out and kill someone across the globe can't avoid any excessive media coverage?

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #36
(04-30-2014, 01:46 AM)w00t Wrote: In what world does it make sense to you that the kind of person with the resources to reach out and kill someone across the globe can't avoid any excessive media coverage?

Yeah, fair point. You win.
Unleash the lead from my pistol into my head bumpin' crystal

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #37
People can't handle to lose so they try 'prank' them and then think that they've won the competition between them to and not to 'mess' with him. Sad people really.

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #38
(04-30-2014, 06:03 AM)VirtualFrost Wrote: People can't handle to lose so they try 'prank' them and then think that they've won the competition between them to and not to 'mess' with him. Sad people really.

I wouldn't say this is a prank. Its a pretty malicious thing to do, and anyone who does it knows the risks it carries. Plus, I doubt adults do it. Kids yes, but adults, probably not.
telegram: @satan_sl

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #39
Talk about RAGE SWAT Tongue Lolz

Reply

RE: Kid swatted over Call Of Duty #40
I once "swatted" a guy because he overdosed on benzos, but that's a legit emergency so idk if it qualifies as swatting
PGP
Sign: F202 79C9 76F7 40BB 54EC 494F 5DEF 1D70 14C1 C4CC
Encrypt: A5B3 1B21 55E1 80AF 4C6E DE83 467B 8EFC 3DEE 681C
Auth: CD55 E8A5 1A08 2933 8BA6 BC88 D81F 1943 739A 3C47

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)