[Pikami]

Is it a good Idea to enter your passwords on random sites?

[Ion]

Is it a good Idea to enter your passwords on random sites?

Not at all. It's actually one of the worst possible ideas relating to passwords.

[pizzaguy541]

Not at all. It's actually one of the worst possible ideas relating to passwords.

Why do you say that?

There's no way that any of those password evaluating sites would know what site(s) that you use that password on or even if you were using it at all.

[Ion]

Why do you say that?

There's no way that any of those password evaluating sites would know what site(s) that you use that password on or even if you were using it at all.

Yes, there is. It's called browser fingerprinting, and accounts have been hacked before using this method.

[pizzaguy541]

I guess that this is not a good result.

Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 6,035,946 tested so far.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 22.53 bits of identifying information.

https://panopticlick.eff.org/

[Pirate]

Most of my passwords are probably 11 characters long or more.

[DarkMuse]

I use passwords of completely pseudo-random characters. All of my passwords use the maximum accepted character limit of the website, and can usually be something similar to "%$GEBrtudb&YVBH)%$^YV$%Vyhg643". I store all of them on an encrypted flash drive, and the crypto key is hidden somewhere very clever in my house.

Same, except my passwords have unicode in them too if the website allows it. Everyone knows hackers hate unicode

[krozy]

I'm satisfied!

[Panther_]

Sinisterly password - Now changed

BTC wallet - Now changed

and since i saw panopticlick
Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 622 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

[Sans]

32-64 chars incl nonprintable when possible, all charsets, and im the laziest fucker on earth and still manage this with keepass. no one has any excuse for less.