RE: [HC Official] HC Crypter 05-05-2013, 12:20 PM
#31
I think its a good solution to crypt my files.
Thanks OP
Thanks OP
[HC Official] HC Crypter v1.1 filter_list | |
(07-28-2013, 10:48 PM)LadyDia Wrote: Does it use key encryption? Is there a source code for this? I'd love to see the algorithm, especially if the source code is all hand-written and no downloaded libraries were used to build it.
If not, is there some documentation of the logic behind the algorithm?
(07-29-2013, 06:41 AM)Solixious Wrote:(07-28-2013, 10:48 PM)LadyDia Wrote: Does it use key encryption? Is there a source code for this? I'd love to see the algorithm, especially if the source code is all hand-written and no downloaded libraries were used to build it.
If not, is there some documentation of the logic behind the algorithm?
The algorithm to encrypt was a part of standard AutoIt library which is AES-256 bit, which is a key based encryption system.
I'll PM you the source code once I find it myself.. I lost it somewhere in my drive.. Lol.. :epic:
(07-29-2013, 02:12 PM)noize Wrote: PMing you the source. Let me know if it's the correct one. I'm not posting it here as I don't know if you're fine with it.
Why not open-source, though?
(07-29-2013, 02:17 PM)Solixious Wrote:(07-29-2013, 02:12 PM)noize Wrote: PMing you the source. Let me know if it's the correct one. I'm not posting it here as I don't know if you're fine with it.
Why not open-source, though?
I don't mind posting it here either.
You may post it here if you have it. It seems as if I have lost the source.
Thank you. :Smile:
(07-29-2013, 02:20 PM)noize Wrote:It is somewhat the same code, but I'm afraid it is not quite readable since all the library functions I have used (for encrypting/decrypting and graphics) has been decompiled into an excessively long set of code. About 1500 approximately, whereas the code I had made was not more than a few hundred lines... Also their are few mistakes in the code due to which it is not compiling again..(07-29-2013, 02:17 PM)Solixious Wrote:(07-29-2013, 02:12 PM)noize Wrote: PMing you the source. Let me know if it's the correct one. I'm not posting it here as I don't know if you're fine with it.
Why not open-source, though?
I don't mind posting it here either.
You may post it here if you have it. It seems as if I have lost the source.
Thank you. :Smile:
I have PMed it to you so that you might add it to the OP, for the people to easily find it, and to as well see if you recognize it as the exact source code.
If you did obfuscate the code, then on decompiling some useless functions/variables appear in the source code. I can say the code I PMed you gives your program, but it might somehow differ from the original (for the UI program, I can assure that the stub is correct).
(07-29-2013, 02:27 PM)Solixious Wrote: It is somewhat the same code, but I'm afraid it is not quite readable since all the library functions I have used (for encrypting/decrypting and graphics) has been decompiled into an excessively long set of code. About 1500 approximately, whereas the code I had made was not more than a few hundred lines... Also their are few mistakes in the code due to which it is not compiling again..
(07-29-2013, 02:43 PM)Solixious Wrote: Found the source code and update it with it...
(07-29-2013, 04:25 PM)bmchris Wrote: So it's not a FUD Crypter, does someone know one free ?