[mothered]

But you replied with

Good move.

You did however, neglect to read the end of my statement:

From your perspective, you have peace of mind that your content Is safe (to some degree).

The keywords being "to some degree". Thus In support of my previous comments.

And my point is that it's not a good move. I don't clearly see the rationale.

I see your point and In no way, shape or form am I In dispute. This Is not a case of "he said, she said". We've both expressed our opinions In a different context, yet when Interpreted accordingly, In agreement to each other.

Leave It at that and focus on the topic at hand.

[Nil]

But you replied with

Good move.

You did however, neglect to read the end of my statement:

From your perspective, you have peace of mind that your content Is safe (to some degree).

The keywords being "to some degree". Thus In support of my previous comments.

And my point is that it's not a good move. I don't clearly see the rationale.

I see your point and In no way, shape or form am I In dispute. This Is not a case of "he said, she said". We've both expressed our opinions In a different context, yet when Interpreted accordingly, In agreement to each other.

Leave It at that and focus on the topic at hand.

To be fair, this is the topic at hand. Discussion over aspects of his website give insight into how he can better design it in the future.

[mothered]

But you replied with

You did however, neglect to read the end of my statement:

From your perspective, you have peace of mind that your content Is safe (to some degree).

The keywords being "to some degree". Thus In support of my previous comments.

And my point is that it's not a good move. I don't clearly see the rationale.

I see your point and In no way, shape or form am I In dispute. This Is not a case of "he said, she said". We've both expressed our opinions In a different context, yet when Interpreted accordingly, In agreement to each other.

Leave It at that and focus on the topic at hand.

To be fair, this is the topic at hand. Discussion over aspects of his website give insight into how he can better design it in the future.

In all fairness as well, the right-click functionality Is certainly on topic. Posting back and forth with opinions directed at each other and not the OP, Isn't.

In conclusion, disabling the right-click does serve a purpose but as we're both aware, It can be easily circumvented.

[Rikka-Chan]

I think the icons could be worked on and centering the content a little bit more.

other than that, great job.

[Cronus]

I think the icons could be worked on and centering the content a little bit more.

other than that, great job.

Thank you bro. Website Created not long ago, thanks to your advice, I improve it, I'll have to work hard enough

[Ecchi]

Like the design, One tiny thing is that you can make the buttons turn white when you hover over them. Other than that, nice website!

[Cronus]

Like the design, One tiny thing is that you can make the buttons turn white when you hover over them. Other than that, nice website!

maybe I will do exactly as you say
thanks guys, relying on your tips to improve the site

[Ecks]

I actually enjoy the sites aesthetic, what others have said would help make it feel more polished.

[zenith]

It's a nice design with a cool background

But the domain is trash

[Noctowl.]

I love the animated background or whatever it is. Looks cool.