Login Register


Epsilon RAT v1.1 filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #21
(06-11-2014, 06:16 PM)Alexaider Wrote: yes it is.
Now about your sig, if you were to roll with a dice concider taking a second look at your code.

Perhaps use int getrandomnumber(1,6){....} This way it looks more of a fair roll Wink

It's a joke...
[Image: Z9DvuyJ.png]

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #22
No i didnt get the joke of the answer always being 4.. Ofc i did
Just 1,6 specifies the range of the joke
[Image: 75eWJ.jpg]
"Be careful what you wish for."

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #23
not bad bro....good work man add more features am sure it will b awesom

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #24
(11-30-2014, 08:29 AM)UnKoWn_CoDeR Wrote: not bad bro....good work man add more features am sure it will b awesom

Why are you reviving 4+month old threads?
---
Click here to get started with Linux!

If I helped you, please +rep me, apparently we've started over on Rep and I'd like to break 100 again...

Inori Wrote: got clickbaited by roger

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #25
1) who said reiko is a hacker? He can be on this community just for programming and the community.
2) chill the damn down all of you-.-
3) this is sinisterly not hackforums, don't even mind to compare both sites again
4) try to reply on good posts not on the bad ones
5) work on extra features, stand out of the other rats that's already available.
(12-01-2014, 06:44 AM)dopamine Wrote: I think I got trolled hard by the script kiddies on this forum and they do actually understand that I am their boss
[Image: eTwayzCs.jpg]

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #26
(04-23-2014, 04:43 PM)Reiko Wrote: The point is that it's going to be in malware databases now.

I would just like to know why does this even matter?

Crypters have been on the black market since a decade. It doesn't even take much knowledge to code one yourself even in x86 ASM.

(11-30-2014, 11:24 AM)MikeM Wrote: 5) work on extra features, stand out of the other rats that's already available.

What is the point? Managed(.NET, Java, etc) malware are a disaster by default. There is no reason to code malware in .NET.

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #27
(11-30-2014, 02:38 PM)dopamine Wrote: I would just like to know why does this even matter?

Crypters have been on the black market since a decade. It doesn't even take much knowledge to code one yourself even in x86 ASM.


What is the point? Managed(.NET, Java, etc) malware are a disaster by default. There is no reason to code malware in .NET.

It's not about how bad it is.
I don't see why people have to be bitchy about shares at the first place.
Programmers aren't programmers to bitch at other works.
Ofc. It's fun at times but understand this these are hobbyist wanting to find put stuff, let them grow and take stuff like spammers and rats like this as educational purposes.
We all have to learn it in some way how did we start? Probablyy everyone made a calculator once in a programming language...
I hope I've made my point clear now, advice others don't hate them..
(12-01-2014, 06:44 AM)dopamine Wrote: I think I got trolled hard by the script kiddies on this forum and they do actually understand that I am their boss
[Image: eTwayzCs.jpg]

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #28
.NET is limited so much, why u don't try to learn another language (like delphi, C++, C ...etc..)

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #29
(12-24-2014, 05:38 PM)NoNs Wrote: .NET is limited so much, why u don't try to learn another language (like delphi, C++, C ...etc..)

Most likely because he is retarded.

Reply

RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 #30
Hello guys, what's new about this Rat???

Reply







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)