[The_Joker]

That's a horrible idea to use something.

I know that. But you have to admin, the GUI is better The included tool have been updated and sorted more effectively.

And re the fact that Ubuntu is debain based: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/pr...data-leaks

I don't trust a 'free' OS that does stuff like that to its users.

[Cyanide and Cynicism]

And re the fact that Ubuntu is debain based: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/pr...data-leaks

I don't trust a 'free' OS that does stuff like that to its users.

Plus Debian kind of has RMS's support, even though it's not his dream distro.

[Adorapuff]

Kali. Just got it and I love it. Debian <3

[§herlock]

Kali is more powerful and has more tools.

[Adorapuff]

Kali is more powerful and has more tools.

Not like the average skid knows how to use anything more than metasploit and sqlmap

[Cosmic]

Kali, purely because it's far better supported.

[Eclipse]

Of the two, definitely Kali, because it's more streamlined to use.

I'm sure you've heard me say this, but I'll say it again. Downloading a hacking distro is stupid, because you will probably never use over half of the tools. Install what you need on your favourite distro, be that Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Mint, or whatever else. You'll learn how to properly use a small set of tools, which is better than knowing a little bit about a lot of tools.

If you need it as a liveCD, you can always convert your tooled-up operating system into an ISO, probably easiest done by editing the SFS in the default ISO.

Id rather have some thing and not need it then need it and not have it. And backtrack is not a hacking distribution.


I prefer backtrack.

[DarkFlux™]

A kali is revised version of BT . i would Vote for Kali .

[Sale0]

I would never use Kali or Backtrack as my main OS, but, I'd use Kali since it's more updated and more efficient.

[Merkuri]

Now Kali since Offensive security stop maintain it, but I liked BackTrack more.