[Six]

I prefer Kali because of the forensic abilites

[Dyme]

I prefer Kali because of the forensic abilites

You don't have a clue about what you're talking about, do you?

[Nefarious]

I prefer Kali because of the forensic abilites

Dude... What?

[Six]

Dude... What?

Kali Linux has a unique ability to perform computer forensics.

[w00t]

Do tell what unique abilities it has.

[Nefarious]

Kali Linux has a unique ability to perform computer forensics.

What unique ability would that be?

[Complibur]

Film you just went full retard. Don't ever go full retard.

[666]

Technically Kali is just the newer Backtrack as you can see Offensive Security the same Creators of Backtrack are the creators of Kali that's the reason Kali gets continues updates. Kali has a couple more features then Backtrack.

[Ultimatum]

This is a pointless comparison:

1. They are made by the same developers of BT, Offensive Security.
2. Kali is the complete OS of BT, meaning you actually install it, whereas BT was designed for Live CD booting, with the option of installing permanently.
3. Kali has larger database of features and applications.

[Dismas]

This is a pointless comparison:

1. They are made by the same developers of BT, Offensive Security.
2. Kali is the complete OS of BT, meaning you actually install it, whereas BT was designed for Live CD booting, with the option of installing permanently.
3. Kali has larger database of features and applications.

Not exactly. There's a few characteristics that might cause people to prefer one over the other. As I mentioned, one of those characteristics would be the distribution they are based off of. Kali is based on Debian, while Backtrack is based on Ubuntu. I know a few people that are still using Backtrack, even though I suggested Kali. People have their reasons, I guess.