[Smiling]

News article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...entry.html



this is fucking awful!

[MrFoX]

Am I happy I don't live in the USA. :rly:

[Captin_Lulzboat]

Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

[Sin_mybb_import13631]

Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

[Captin_Lulzboat]

Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

I no all of them are not dangerous. A lot of us no that. But having the potential 1 out of every 10 people we take in could be. Why take the chance? Were basically at war and taking in people that can easily pose as a refugee. They have already been caught in turkey and other places. It will happen here. And it history shows that our TSA sucks and people get through..

[Sin_mybb_import13631]

Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

I no all of them are not dangerous. A lot of us no that. But having the potential 1 out of every 10 people we take in could be. Why take the chance? Were basically at war and taking in people that can easily pose as a refugee. They have already been caught in turkey and other places. It will happen here. And it history shows that our TSA sucks and people get through..

At that point what better are we then North Korea? Shutting the border and basically saying "nobody allowed" while we attack other countries? 
Or would you like to be racist and not allow just Syrian's / Muslims? you're thinking out of panic, which is what IS wants.

[amazon_SF]

Sad life, ripperino.

[Captin_Lulzboat]

Illinois was overruled. They HAVE to accept. This is BS and ill be at any protest to try to stop them

All states have to accept them, our foreign policy is that anyone that complies with any immigration laws can get in, with the proper screening. You're all worried that we'll get fucked, but you gotta remember that we actually have pretty strict immigration laws. I don't necessarily agree with this choice, especially after France, but I do believe not every single refugee is looking to fuck us in the ass. Also, I believe even if there were attempts made to harm certain structures here in the US, they would mostly be stamped out as we are a lot less lenient on warnings, especially after incidents world wide, as well as after we've suffered so many attacks due to ignorance to warnings.

I no all of them are not dangerous. A lot of us no that. But having the potential 1 out of every 10 people we take in could be. Why take the chance? Were basically at war and taking in people that can easily pose as a refugee. They have already been caught in turkey and other places. It will happen here. And it history shows that our TSA sucks and people get through..

At that point what better are we then North Korea? Shutting the border and basically saying "nobody allowed" while we attack other countries? 
Or would you like to be racist and not allow just Syrian's / Muslims? you're thinking out of panic, which is what IS wants.

Im not really thinking out of panic since it has happened. Its not just speculation that maybe they will do something. They have been caught trying to pose as refugees. Its a fact that they are coming in this way.

instead of just openly letting them in, we need a better way to running back ground checks and such. Currently we don't have a way to gain back ground on most of them because they are not in our systems and we have to go off another countries which is plain.

BTW, I am far from racist

[Buildoman]

I'm not racist, but I don't want my town flooded with people suddenly.

[amazon_SF]

I'm not racist, but I don't want my town flooded with people suddenly.

Honestly, The USA startd this whole bs.