[Eclipse]

Make a suggestion thread if you want to see the 'Ageless' award.

I'd like to see the ageless award and so would quite a few other members. Maybe with a larger requirement than a week?

@Oni

[Customer]

Honestly, it would give users a reason to be on. So really it could only go up from there.

In my opinion.

[Satan]

I'd be for it, so yes. ???? it'd definitely need to be more than a week though

[Equinox]

Honestly, it would give users a reason to be on. So really it could only go up from there.

In my opinion.

You're right, it gave me a reason to be on for 500 hours, even going past it to a whopping 2 months. I sort of find a user's online time shows how much they value a forum, rather than posts (although there are of course exceptions to this).

[MiS]

Did the old requirement only used to be a week, or was a it a month?

[Equinox]

Did the old requirement only used to be a week, or was a it a month?

500 hours, so ~3 weeks (or 2.97619 weeks to be exact).

[mothered]

I'm all for this.

It's an Incentive not only for the member, but also to boost the activity of the forum.
If I may suggest, perhaps create a poll and If majority rules (by far), then I don't see any reason It should not be Implemented.

[Losi]

I'm down for this award. Then again, I'm already eligible for this award. I got 3 weeks under my belt.

[Nyx]

I wouldn't mind seeing this come back, I am almost at the point where I can get it too (444 hours) so I mean just spend a bit more time posting and it's mine :p

[Eclipse]

I'm down for this award. Then again, I'm already eligible for this award. I got 3 weeks under my belt.

I wouldn't mind seeing this come back, I am almost at the point where I can get it too (444 hours) so I mean just spend a bit more time posting and it's mine :p

The time period will probably be higher than 500 hours as most of us have clocked more already.