[cxS]

I'm not saying that arguing is particularity ineffectual.. I'm trying embellish the quality of the arguments itself. Constructive criticism is prodigious and has it place,but this is just mindless incoherent bitching. Your expressed vituperation about how he is using "leached code" had no point. You also feel the need to scrutinize work that i0xIllusi0n obviously was not passionate about. This program serves a purpose and has a place, and if you really care about how well this program does it's job then recommend a better solution and stop crying over spilt milk. Also the way you argue is completely childish.. taking snip bits of statements, and completely manipulating the context of which it was used in while ignoring the original syntax of the statement. Then you use that manipulated statement to make a argument whilst completely ignoring the statements that was related to you in a negative way.
A good example of this would be how you quoted "(me)" "I'm just being inquisitive, and am wondering at where are you trying to get at with this argument?" Then argued about how I contradicted myself, but if you had basic reading and comprehension skills you would know that I was referring to the action of senseless arguing/negative arguing.. not no arguing at all. You should just apologize for your incapacity to contain the urge to be a bitch.:blackhat:
~Also yes I know about memory management haha

Who cares if he was passionate about it or not, why post it if it can't be given feedback? Furthermore, why even post work that you don't care about? If it's shitty code, others who don't have a clue might want to know the facts.

Also the way you argue is completely childish.. taking snip bits of statements, and completely manipulating the context of which it was used in while ignoring the original syntax of the statement.

Sounds like exactly what you're doing with reason and meaning over logic here. So explain to me why what I'm being acused of doing is so bad when you do virtually the same?

I've posted why it's bad, I don't need to write better code for others to copy and paste, they just need to know what's bad about it and any good programmer can make their own solutions based on that information. You obviously are not one; you don't belong here. Hence, your opinions are senseless contributions to what you consider a bad argument. You can't comprehend the validity in what I've posted.

Perhaps that's where this *frustration* of yours is coming from? :S You didn't have a place to begin being a part of the debate/discussion in the first place. What have you done? http://www.sinister.ly/search.php?action...ds&uid=479 - Your best asset is all *talk* it would seem. Become a programmer, then try to see my point through proper glasses, or take that horseshoe out of your ass and quit pretending like you are the voice of reason here for a discussion that you can't oversee.

Sitting back and watching was arguments kick off... we all know they are useless, and we all know there's two sides to a story. Always. I just find it hilarious that cxS claims to be a superiority when in reality he has nowhere to stand. All he does is try to contradict what other people say, then he tries to make something of it. When in the beginning, he really has no side.

Is this your excuse for someone proving you wrong or that your code is perhaps bad? Then further claim that it was code you half-assed written once the information is out? C'mon...