RE: Want to make a filesystem. 12-02-2017, 05:51 AM
#18
(12-02-2017, 01:24 AM)phyrrus9 Wrote: Additionally, we don't need an OSdev lecture, we both have a lot of experience with that sort of stuff. I don't think you understand what kernel dev is. If it's part of the kernel, it's kernel dev. The kernel can run in userland and still be part of the kernel (do some research on BSD, XNU, and NT). We aren't trying to put you down, but you're trying to assert yourself here and it's not the place. I was like you when I was young (look at some of my posts from 5 years ago, you'll catch the tail end of my high school days).
I don't need to hear minute exceptions about microkernels and hybrids that perform much of their functions through userspace servers and drivers (which themselves are not part of the kernel), that's irrelevant to the current case so you're just spouting shit.
You're not even correct about the BSD kernel, which itself is monolithic.
Furthermore, you seem to enjoy making incorrect assumptions about my age and using this as part of your argument. That's weak. In a previous post you accused me of being off topic in this thread by using examples of other p2p networks to make a comparison (while also erroneously claiming IPFS uses a blockchain database). Nonetheless, you continue to make off-topic arguments that generally target myself rather than my claim. I am unsure whether this is a tactic intended to spite me or simply a result of your pretentiousness, but it's highly unproductive. I am not here to assert myself. I have bigger things to worry about than my reputation on some scrappy tech forum I visit occasionally. I am here to make an argument, and the discussion has been mostly derailed from the technology in favor of passive-aggressive ad-hominems regarding my age, simply because I criticized a facet of your project.
It's poor form to turn to targeting a person in an argument, even more so if you lack the information needed to make such statements. For the number of instances of comments regarding maturity you have made, it seems you have a way to go.
Dealing with this low level of discussion isn't worth the time anymore.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017, 05:52 AM by phaz0n.)