RE: Hide tags 11-30-2017, 06:36 PM
#12
(11-30-2017, 06:55 AM)Synthx Wrote: I do agree with you. One thing though, I absolutely am 100% against this: You have to reply to the thread to unlock the content inside the [hide][/hide] or you have to pay NSP to unlock the content. This creates spam, and people going on every thread that has hidden content saying "Thanks for this share!". I feel if this was implemented, it would need to be if you want to see what is inside the hide tag, you must be a registered member with your email verified.
Edit:
P.S. @Slacker why am I not on your best friend list? lol, jk.
(11-30-2017, 08:54 AM)mothered Wrote:(11-30-2017, 06:55 AM)Synthx Wrote: This creates spam, and people going on every thread that has hidden content saying "Thanks for this share!".
A minimum char requirement when replying to a given post can be Implemented , thereby Increase the likely hood of a quality response.
I've come across a few boards where the hide tags worked efficiently, but the majority simply generated LQ posts.
I also agree here. Tags that require you to reply to the specific post in order to view it are counterintuitive. I believe the suggestion was that they require n posts across the whole board in order to open hide tags. Character limits are mildly useful, but rarely help. You get people posting this
Quote:nice! ,.......................................limit

























![[+]](https://sinister.ly/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)