RE: Throttle Hash Cracker v1.28a 05-06-2013, 02:21 AM
#36
I don't need to, I get email notifications to any replies on any threads I post in by default.
It is feedback, in fact any post given to you is feedback you moron because feedback is a general term (I suggest you look this word up)... Feedback can be in the form of criticism, advice, or just miscellaneous comments on your thread.
I'm saying you're not willing to update it because you probably won't, you still haven't, and you just said that the a in the version didn't mean anything. The best you'll do is probably just look at what other .NET methods are available for you to "crack" other hashes and add them without disposing at all; creating hundreds of undisposed objects on the heap for the GC to come along and do an expensive sweep every now and then
. And you can't claim that these facts are just opinions. That just shows that you clearly haven't taken the time to investigate on why I am saying what I have said about disposing.
I guess so, if the programmer we're talking about here is you lol. Even if this was a half-assed program, it just means that released stuff from you is a joke because it's probably just a hack job for most of the things you make anyways.
And obfuscation? Based on what I have figured out from the code you have so far, what's the point? Nobody is going to leech your junky code anyways if they had any idea. And if they do, they are probably just skids that don't know any better.
That's all I have to say..
It is feedback, in fact any post given to you is feedback you moron because feedback is a general term (I suggest you look this word up)... Feedback can be in the form of criticism, advice, or just miscellaneous comments on your thread.
I'm saying you're not willing to update it because you probably won't, you still haven't, and you just said that the a in the version didn't mean anything. The best you'll do is probably just look at what other .NET methods are available for you to "crack" other hashes and add them without disposing at all; creating hundreds of undisposed objects on the heap for the GC to come along and do an expensive sweep every now and then
. And you can't claim that these facts are just opinions. That just shows that you clearly haven't taken the time to investigate on why I am saying what I have said about disposing.Quote:Either way, you're still expecting too much.
I guess so, if the programmer we're talking about here is you lol. Even if this was a half-assed program, it just means that released stuff from you is a joke because it's probably just a hack job for most of the things you make anyways.
And obfuscation? Based on what I have figured out from the code you have so far, what's the point? Nobody is going to leech your junky code anyways if they had any idea. And if they do, they are probably just skids that don't know any better.
That's all I have to say..
-- cxS
[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]
![[+]](https://sinister.ly/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)