RE: [Request] Screen capture 04-27-2013, 07:03 AM
#39
(04-27-2013, 06:55 AM)i0xIllusi0n Wrote: You don't even know the code I was using xD and you think you can tell me I have no idea what I'm talking about? Lol look at yourself.
I don't need proof. Anybody can look up some stuff and explain your side of the story. There's multiple sides to everything.
Many people who are better coders than you have told me it was invoking. I knew it was invoking. Then you come along and say it wasn't. Ok, show me your proof? Show me you even know the code I was using? Lol
This is seriously too fucking funny.
Quote:You don't even know the code I was using xDHere we go again, the same thing I have already covered in a previous post, or have you forgotten? Perhaps you didn't read it?
Quote:Lol look at yourself.
Well, where is this proof? Or did you not see that big bold text I posted in my previous post, after all of the other times I have posted it? I'm open to any proof that you can provide, but I'm not seeing any lol. Keep talking though, your claims do not mean an ounce of truth until proof is supplied and packaged along with them.
Quote:I don't need proof. Anybody can look up some stuff and explain your side of the story. There's multiple sides to everything.
Of course, but only one correct side for what Invoking means, and you're going to say that MSDN is wrong in this case? I think your head is not right... You're definitely too "good" for having to provide any proof though right? Everybody should just assume that what you say is right? Because I don't think so.
Quote:Many people who are better coders than you have told me it was invoking.
Please list them off, John Carmack? programmers from Google? Microsoft? Apple?
Quote:I knew it was invoking. Then you come along and say it wasn't. Ok, show me your proof? Show me you even know the code I was using? Lol
You're incapable of having a discussion here because you can't even remember, or comprehend the post that you are replying to... I already went over this, a couple times now. It's just round in circles again with you though. I've shown you all the proof that you should ever need. The way you explained and used invoking in the context of your post showed that you don't know what it is, so why should I need any code of yours? Do you not have any common sense?
Funny how you have the audacity to ask me for proof though, after I've been providing it all along, and yet you haven't posted even a single piece of your own evidence though. What are you smoking? :S
I will await yet another response from you even though you said you were done a few posts ago, and one that still contains no proof that shows I am wrong. You're doing good in this discussion aren't you? lol.
-- cxS
[ Haskell/.NET/C/C++ - Software Engineer ]