[hexexom]

Climate is cyclical in nature. Every couple years we have El Nino / La Nina. Every ~30 years we experience shifts between a minor warming and cooling period. Then we have larger changes that play out over hundreds and thousands of years. These longer cycles are driven by things like the sun's magnetic fields changing and the wobble of the earth on it's rotational axis. These are facts acknowledged throughout the scientific community.

Science is meant to be questioned. We have the scientific method for a reason. Develop a hypothesis, establish a theory, and prove through repeatable observations over time. The argument for man made climate change is a theory at best, supported only by limited data. That's why at some point they shifted from "global warming" to "climate change". Back in the 1970's, all the Al Gore types were preaching we were going to have another ice age. We are now told man made climate change is responsible for both high temperatures and low temperatures, heavy rains and droughts. How?? I'm sorry, but the argument is illogical and lacks empirical evidence.

Our planet is millions of years old. While I might see human activity having a minor influence on climate over the last ~150 years, it's just a fart in the wind compared to what nature does without our help.

The damage is often overstated/exaggerated. It's naive to think we can offset any damage developing countries might be doing (i.e. China/India).

With all the subsidies and credits for electric vehicles, there's probably a significant amount of corruption/money-laundering as well.

Pretty much. There's more money to be made by pushing an agenda than living with the status quo.