[cr33pyguy]

The only reason I might disagree with the idea of not intervening would be because of WW2’s impact on the economy. However, I don't believe the US should intervene normally. Putin's answer is likely based on the fact that Paul would cut support to Israel. While Israel is one of our greatest allies, they are also a liability, and they cost a great deal to aid.

Now, I don't necessarily agree with all of his jibber-jabber on foreign policy, but I do agree with a lot of the other points he has. He was one of the few candidates that actually wanted to cut spending, rather than raise the debt ceiling. As you can see, we are now having issues with the debt ceiling.

Regardless, the United States shouldn't be intervening as much as it has been.

Completely agree with this too. Sometimes the US just seems to think that only they matter. Of course this would fall within the theories of war; Political Realism, which basically states that the profits of your country go before anything else.

Weirdly enough the US doesn't seem to want to admit that the old ways might not work; I'd at least like to see them introduce a public health care and education.

- Cr33py