RE: For those who struggle with disable_functions. 10-08-2013, 01:48 PM
#6
(10-08-2013, 06:32 AM)Starfall Wrote: Love it. Didn't we discuss this in-depth on Skype before it was posted to HF?
Thank you.
We sure did. If my memory serves, I was telling you the methods I was writing about, and you mentioned the ini override, which I thought would have been dead by then.
(10-08-2013, 06:43 AM)Oni Wrote: I always love seeing people's disable_functions line. The funniest times were when people made typos.
As do I. I find it somewhat funny when people post code and they have made that mistake.
I can see why people make the mistake; it sounds strange when read with ini_get() encapsulating the string, but it makes sense once you have taken it in the perspective of the developers, as you use ini_set() to disable functions for that runtime instance, which sounds more logical when read. That's how I imagine they came up with the name.
![[Image: 8Yoto.png]](http://i.imgur.com/8Yoto.png)
![[+]](https://sinister.ly/images/modern/collapse_collapsed.png)