[mothered]

I agree, I think it's a load of nonsense.

This article explains it well: https://phastar.com/blog/264-let-the-dat...t-concerns

I understand why people are scared, but there is no data to back the claims up, unless there is other things that we do not know.

I haven't looked Into It, so I may be prematurely speaking.

If It's not the case, I'm at a loss as to how they've come to the conclusion that It creates blood clots. Surely It must be based on medical evidence or clinical trials.

I am confused as well, that's why I think there must be some other facts/data that we do not know about. Strictly speaking about blood clots, there has been less blood clots per million for those who have had the AstraZeneca vaccine than those who have not.

I feel like there was a few cases in a short time possibly, and that caused everyone to panic. Herd mentality.

If you Google 'AstraZeneca blood clot' hundreds of articles come up saying there is no data to support the claim. I find it shocking how developed countries such as Denmark and Norway have halted it to be honest, they must be basing it off something but I am not sure what.

You've made some very valid points.

Perhaps they know something we don't, but for medical and/or legal purposes, they're refusing to release the details.