CNN cuts off congressman after he mentions WikiLeaks 10-20-2016, 11:36 PM
#1
> The reason you don't trust mainstream media
| CNN cuts off congressman after he mentions WikiLeaks filter_list | |
![[Image: pBD38Xq.png]](http://i.imgur.com/pBD38Xq.png)
(10-21-2016, 03:48 AM)Dyme Wrote: Oh give me a break... CNN constantly has trump surrogates on and lets them spout their rhetoric. There is discussion of wikileaks all the time on CNN by both reporters and trump surrogates.
(10-21-2016, 05:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(10-21-2016, 03:48 AM)Dyme Wrote: Oh give me a break... CNN constantly has trump surrogates on and lets them spout their rhetoric. There is discussion of wikileaks all the time on CNN by both reporters and trump surrogates.
You could argue that Fox has Clinton surrogates on quite regularly, too. Personally, I have nothing against either channel, but I would prefer the media at least try to be more objective and less bias.
(10-21-2016, 05:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(10-21-2016, 03:48 AM)Dyme Wrote: Oh give me a break... CNN constantly has trump surrogates on and lets them spout their rhetoric. There is discussion of wikileaks all the time on CNN by both reporters and trump surrogates.
You could argue that Fox has Clinton surrogates on quite regularly, too. Personally, I have nothing against either channel, but I would prefer the media at least try to be more objective and less bias.
![[Image: 4GNsK67.png]](http://i.imgur.com/4GNsK67.png)
(10-21-2016, 07:32 AM)Jiggly Wrote:(10-21-2016, 05:04 AM)Oni Wrote:(10-21-2016, 03:48 AM)Dyme Wrote: Oh give me a break... CNN constantly has trump surrogates on and lets them spout their rhetoric. There is discussion of wikileaks all the time on CNN by both reporters and trump surrogates.
You could argue that Fox has Clinton surrogates on quite regularly, too. Personally, I have nothing against either channel, but I would prefer the media at least try to be more objective and less bias.
To be honest, this was my exact response. The amount of times I have said "Can they really say/ask that!?" when talking about the interviewers... Well, it shows how shocked I am by the shameless show of bias by american news.
Not to say UK news isn't biased, they are just more subtle and pretend they're not biased.
![[Image: qcYJ3l.png]](https://i.skull.moe/u/qcYJ3l.png)
(10-21-2016, 08:00 AM)Oni Wrote:(10-21-2016, 07:32 AM)Jiggly Wrote:(10-21-2016, 05:04 AM)Oni Wrote: You could argue that Fox has Clinton surrogates on quite regularly, too. Personally, I have nothing against either channel, but I would prefer the media at least try to be more objective and less bias.
To be honest, this was my exact response. The amount of times I have said "Can they really say/ask that!?" when talking about the interviewers... Well, it shows how shocked I am by the shameless show of bias by american news.
Not to say UK news isn't biased, they are just more subtle and pretend they're not biased.
I suppose it's more obvious to outsiders. Less so to people that actually live here.
![[Image: 4GNsK67.png]](http://i.imgur.com/4GNsK67.png)