[Legolas]

Thanks, I know this is not that good of crypter but I am trying to add some features. This is just first release And by the way good luck with your crypter! :Thumbs-Up:

Okay. As i said, if you hava any problem on adding new features or generally making updates or anything, let me know.

[Legolas]

Thanks, I know this is not that good of crypter but I am trying to add some features. This is just first release And by the way good luck with your crypter! :Thumbs-Up:

Okay. As i said, if you hava any problem on adding new features or generally making updates or anything, let me know.

[Master Antrax]

Thanks, I know this is not that good of crypter but I am trying to add some features. This is just first release And by the way good luck with your crypter! :Thumbs-Up:

Okay. As i said, if you hava any problem on adding new features or generally making updates or anything, let me know.

Yes I will keep that in mind. I have also edited the credits and the DL.

[Master Antrax]

Thanks, I know this is not that good of crypter but I am trying to add some features. This is just first release And by the way good luck with your crypter! :Thumbs-Up:

Okay. As i said, if you hava any problem on adding new features or generally making updates or anything, let me know.

Yes I will keep that in mind. I have also edited the credits and the DL.

[TheDeceptionist]

I said this in the original post. I will not scan the stub because it will become more detected.

The stub will only become more detected if the scanner shares the result with AV companies. This is something that most scanners do but I'm sure that you'll be able to find a no-distribute scanner somewhere online.

Edit: Nah don't do it. I think most scanners that claim to be no-distribute are actually distributing.

[TheDeceptionist]

I said this in the original post. I will not scan the stub because it will become more detected.

The stub will only become more detected if the scanner shares the result with AV companies. This is something that most scanners do but I'm sure that you'll be able to find a no-distribute scanner somewhere online.

Edit: Nah don't do it. I think most scanners that claim to be no-distribute are actually distributing.

[Master Antrax]

I said this in the original post. I will not scan the stub because it will become more detected.

The stub will only become more detected if the scanner shares the result with AV companies. This is something that most scanners do but I'm sure that you'll be able to find a no-distribute scanner somewhere online.

Edit: Nah don't do it. I think most scanners that claim to be no-distribute are actually distributing.

yeah, but I did find a site that truly does NOT distribute scanned and it got a 7/40. So it is mostly UD no major AVs picked it up.
AV Detects:

• Kapersky
  
• NANO
  
• Ikarus
  
• F-Secure
  
• Norman
  
• ESET
  
• Avira
  

---

I am still working on making it more UD.

[Master Antrax]

I said this in the original post. I will not scan the stub because it will become more detected.

The stub will only become more detected if the scanner shares the result with AV companies. This is something that most scanners do but I'm sure that you'll be able to find a no-distribute scanner somewhere online.

Edit: Nah don't do it. I think most scanners that claim to be no-distribute are actually distributing.

yeah, but I did find a site that truly does NOT distribute scanned and it got a 7/40. So it is mostly UD no major AVs picked it up.
AV Detects:

• Kapersky
  
• NANO
  
• Ikarus
  
• F-Secure
  
• Norman
  
• ESET
  
• Avira
  

---

I am still working on making it more UD.

[Deque]

You can not prevent a public crypter from getting detected. Don't put too much work into that, unless you use it as exercise.
Other people will scan your tool with VT and you can do nothing about it, even if you find a non-distributing scanner.
The real use of HC tools like these is them being open-source and a possibility to learn from them and with them.

[Master Antrax]

You can not prevent a public crypter from getting detected. Don't put too much work into that, unless you use it as exercise.
Other people will scan your tool with VT and you can do nothing about it, even if you find a non-distributing scanner.
The real use of HC tools like these is them being open-source and a possibility to learn from them and with them.

I know it will never be completely FUD with it being public but I don't want it to have 40/50 detection ratio.