Login Register


Count to 1000! [#3] filter_list
Author
Message
RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #61
(01-19-2014, 12:49 PM)Duubz Wrote: 60 is . . . ?

60 is one less than 61.
[Image: R5aCcWV.png]

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #62
(01-19-2014, 12:50 PM)Cressi Wrote: 60 is one less than 61.

But one more than 61 is 62.
[Image: BXqGARG.png]

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #63
(01-19-2014, 12:50 PM)Duubz Wrote: But one more than 61 is 62.

One more than that is 63...

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #64
(01-19-2014, 12:53 PM)Sparks Wrote: One more than that is 63...

But then there's 64...
[Image: BXqGARG.png]

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #65
(01-19-2014, 12:56 PM)Duubz Wrote: But then there's 64...

...which is the square of eight, which timed by five and added to 25 is 65.
[Image: R5aCcWV.png]

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #66
(01-19-2014, 12:57 PM)Cressi Wrote: ...which is the square of eight, which timed by five and added to 25 is 65.


66 is a sphenic number, a triangular number, a hexagonal number, and a semi-meandric number. Being a multiple of a perfect number, 66 is itself a semiperfect number.
Since it is possible to find sequences of 66 consecutive integers such that each inner member shares a factor with either the first or the last member, 66 is an Erdős–Woods number.

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #67
(01-19-2014, 12:58 PM)Sparks Wrote: 66 is a sphenic number, a triangular number, a hexagonal number, and a semi-meandric number. Being a multiple of a perfect number, 66 is itself a semiperfect number.
Since it is possible to find sequences of 66 consecutive integers such that each inner member shares a factor with either the first or the last member, 66 is an Erdős–Woods number.

Indeed, my dear fellow human being.

67 is impossible to factorize, as it is a Pillai prime (18! + 1), as well as a Heegner number.
[Image: R5aCcWV.png]

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #68
Fancy a 68? Blow me now and I'll give you 1 later.

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #69
69 is a common sex position.

Reply

RE: Count to 1000! [#3] #70
But that seventy though..
[Image: BXqGARG.png]

Reply







Users browsing this thread: