[cr33pyguy]

Just interested in the way that the forum divides up... add any other options that I've left out, thanks

[Cyanide and Cynicism]

Seriously? You include all of those but not Libertarianism.

Anarchism isn't one view, it's a branch of a shitload of political views.

Monarchism and fascism aren't even in the same category as the others, you can have a Socialist and fascist country.

--------------

But seriously, I'm Libertarian (not the dumb-fuck Ron Paul supporter kind). I only believe in welfare, free health-care and other things from the government after the country has established a good economy, our current American economy is too fucked right now to even work. We're giving welfare to people when we barely have any money ourselves. For the best view of what I believe in, look at Switzerland.

[cr33pyguy]

Seriously? You include all of those but not Libertarianism.

Anarchism isn't one view, it's a branch of a shitload of political views.

Monarchism and fascism aren't even in the same category as the others, you can have a Socialist and fascist country.

--------------

But seriously, I'm Libertarian (not the dumb-fuck Ron Paul supporter kind). I only believe in welfare, free health-care and other things from the government after the country has established a good economy, our current American economy is too fucked right now to even work. We're giving welfare to people when we barely have any money ourselves. For the best view of what I believe in, look at Switzerland.

I told you i might forget something Libertarianism was on my original list, but i forgot it when i put up the choices.

Also, you're completely right, socialism is a economical model, while most of the rest are political views/systems. Still thought of putting it there, sorry if it confused/ pissed you off.
-cr33py

[Nefarious]

Filthy liberal reporting in.

[Oni]

Seriously? You include all of those but not Libertarianism.

Anarchism isn't one view, it's a branch of a shitload of political views.

Monarchism and fascism aren't even in the same category as the others, you can have a Socialist and fascist country.

--------------

But seriously, I'm Libertarian (not the dumb-fuck Ron Paul supporter kind). I only believe in welfare, free health-care and other things from the government after the country has established a good economy, our current American economy is too fucked right now to even work. We're giving welfare to people when we barely have any money ourselves. For the best view of what I believe in, look at Switzerland.

What's wrong with Ron Paul? I'd take him over the other previous candidates.

Edit: Anarchism is really just a more extreme version of libertarianism. It's the exact opposite of monarchism, really.

[Adorapuff]

What's wrong with Ron Paul? I'd take him over the other previous candidates.

His shitty foreign policy.

[Oni]

His shitty foreign policy.

I can only guess as to why that would be your answer.

[Cyanide and Cynicism]

I can only guess as to why that would be your answer.

The guy says that we shouldn't have intervened in WW2.

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php...onsistency

Just a couple of them, I'm way too fucking lazy to compile a list of everything he's flip-flopped about and his shitty views.

[Oni]

The guy says that we shouldn't have intervened in WW2.

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php...onsistency

Just a couple of them, I'm way too fucking lazy to compile a list of everything he's flip-flopped about and his shitty views.

The only reason I might disagree with the idea of not intervening would be because of WW2’s impact on the economy. However, I don't believe the US should intervene normally. Putin's answer is likely based on the fact that Paul would cut support to Israel. While Israel is one of our greatest allies, they are also a liability, and they cost a great deal to aid.

Now, I don't necessarily agree with all of his jibber-jabber on foreign policy, but I do agree with a lot of the other points he has. He was one of the few candidates that actually wanted to cut spending, rather than raise the debt ceiling. As you can see, we are now having issues with the debt ceiling.

Regardless, the United States shouldn't be intervening as much as it has been.

[Cyanide and Cynicism]

Regardless, the United States shouldn't be intervening as much as it has been.

I agree with you on that.