![]() |
Leak Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Design (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Design) +--- Forum: Resources (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Resources) +--- Thread: Leak Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 (/Thread-Leak-Unity-Asset-UnitZ-UNET-2-0) |
Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - MesaGFX - 07-22-2017 ![]() This project provided a useful template and tools to help you create your open world multiplayer game in a few steps. the project includes difference enemies with optimized AI and difference functioning items like Gun , Sword , Grenade , Food and more you can also craft, hunt, or build your base and play around with your friends by drive a Car, This project also ready for a several shooting gameplay styles such as Team / Death match , Co-op Survival Horror , Zombie Swarm , You can create your world, custom your rule and enjoy with your friends. Core Features - Unet Networking System - Unity Multiplayer Services - First Person Shooting template - Item and inventory - Harvest / Crafting / Cooking / Hunting / Cut Trees - Day / Night cycle - Vehicles - Team Deathmatch game mod Code: https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/33494 Code: Save $49.50 http://casualient.com/29ON RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - Pikami - 07-22-2017 Thanks for sharing. I think this might be useful RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - MesaGFX - 07-22-2017 (07-22-2017, 07:26 PM)Pikami Wrote: Thanks for sharing. No problem and I hope so RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - zorrophreak - 07-22-2017 Damn, certainly feature packed. Thanks for sharing! RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - MesaGFX - 07-23-2017 (07-22-2017, 11:44 PM)zorrophreak Wrote: Damn, certainly feature packed. Thanks for sharing! Youre more than welcome and thank you for the rep RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - JustAnotherGuy - 06-28-2018 Hello bro, the link is broken RE: Unity Asset - UnitZ UNET 2.0 - Vultra - 06-28-2018 (06-28-2018, 08:06 AM)JustAnotherGuy Wrote: Hello bro, the link is broken Please don't grave dig unless it was necessarily. What you should've done is, created a new thread requesting for a version like this rather then digging it back to the top for no reason. Also, the OP hasn't been on in 4 months. So, I would count as inactive. |