![]() |
|
Is Ruby's Decline In Popularity Permanent? - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: Is Ruby's Decline In Popularity Permanent? (/Thread-Is-Ruby-s-Decline-In-Popularity-Permanent) |
Is Ruby's Decline In Popularity Permanent? - Ecks - 07-02-2017 Ruby has had a reputation as a user-friendly language for building web applications. But its slippage in this month's RedMonk Programming Language Rankings has raised questions about where exactly the language stands among developers these days. The twice-yearly RedMonk index ranked Ruby at eighth, the lowest position ever for the language. "Swift and now Kotlin are the obvious choices for native mobile development. Go, Rust, and others are clearer modern choices for infrastructure," said RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady. "The web, meanwhile, where Ruby really made its mark with Rails, is now an aggressively competitive and crowded field." Although O'Grady noted that Ruby remains "tremendously popular," participants on sites such as Hacker News and Quora have increasingly questioned whether Ruby is dying. In the Redmonk rankings, Ruby peaked at fourth place in 2013, reinforcing the perception it is in decline, if a slow one. Read More @ https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/621028/ruby-decline-popularity-may-permanent/ RE: Is Ruby's Decline In Popularity Permanent? - Inori - 07-02-2017 The problem here is citing Quora as a credible source In all seriousness, though, Ruby is mediocre at pretty much everything except for app dev and heavy computation, so there's usually something better suited for any given project. That doesn't change the fact that it's easy to learn, accessible, and good for integrating into larger frameworks (e.g. Metasploit).
|