![]() |
Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: Coding (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Coding) +--- Forum: Visual Basic & .NET Framework (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Visual-Basic-NET-Framework) +--- Thread: Folder Encryption | VB.Net (/Thread-Folder-Encryption-VB-Net) Pages:
1
2
|
Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Killpot - 09-11-2015 Greetings all! I've been working up a new application and figured I would release it here for all of you that might find it usefull! If you do use this program please leave some feadback, I'd like to hear what you think, and it will encourage me to keep developing this project! And just to clarify, I did get the idea from this post: http://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4888596, but I'm to lazy to convert the code, so I just made my own version with my twist on it ![]() The general Idea of the program is this: You chose a folder, and the folder is encrypted and all the data is stuffed into a "Files.Encrypted" in the same directory as the program. Then after you've done that, create a decryption stub, this stub is only compatable with that "Files.Encrypted" file, they both have the same salt packed inside, and will only work with eachother. Then when you want to unpack the files, run the unpack stub, enter the password it was created with, and it will place the files like they were in the folder, inside a folder located in the same directory as the application called "Decompressed". Some key features are: - Recursive file searching - All dependencies are packed into the decrypter - MOAR ENCRYPTION!! Rijndael Open, Blowfish, Twofish, Serpent, Mars - Minimal RAM overhead. (Writes as it reads) - No critical information is stored inside the stub Photos: ![]() //UPDATEZIES// Added a ton of stuff, almost completely redone, some new wicked encryption algorithms have been added in, along with a performance boost because of how I handle reading and writing files now ![]() As always, it's not obfuscated, so if you realllllllllly want it, you know what to do. https://github.com/ImVexed/ThreeCrypt RE: Folder Encryption + Source | VB.Net - Sin_mybb_import13631 - 09-11-2015 you should add [hide] tags on your link, I personally really like this. Mind if I use the code to include in a tool? I will credit ![]() RE: Folder Encryption + Source | VB.Net - Killpot - 09-11-2015 (09-11-2015, 12:58 AM)Sin Wrote: you should add [hide] tags on your link, I personally really like this. Mind if I use the code to include in a tool? I will credit Ye Sure, and what if I want the crawler bots to have good tools too ;_; RE: Folder Encryption + Source | VB.Net - Sin_mybb_import13631 - 09-11-2015 (09-11-2015, 12:58 AM)Killpot Wrote: Ye Sure, and what if I want the crawler bots to have good tools too ;_; crawler bots are scery bb :'( dun do it RE: Folder Encryption + Source | VB.Net - Kotomi - 09-11-2015 Software is clean in github and I guess the scan but I don't trust any non distribute scan because people use them to keep rats alive -,- RE: Folder Encryption + Source | VB.Net - Killpot - 09-11-2015 (09-11-2015, 01:07 AM)Azzurra Wrote: Software is clean in github and I guess the scan but I don't trust any non distribute scan because people use them to keep rats alive -,- And I don trust no distribute bb RE: Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Killpot - 10-12-2015 Post updated, enjoy yo RE: Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Killpot - 10-15-2015 Dank updates yo, a little more code cleanup, and a new GUI update! RE: Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Jacket - 10-15-2015 I wouldn't make this public otherwise retards are going to start scanning this on VT all day ![]() RE: Folder Encryption | VB.Net - Killpot - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 10:33 PM)Cloud Wrote: I wouldn't make this public otherwise retards are going to start scanning this on VT all day Eh I'm not super worried about it, there's nothing malicious about it, what would bother me though would be a false positive, because distributing sites are known to do that. the only thing I could think that might be grabbed by AV is the stub generation, but I can always use a different method that isn't detected. |