+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Design (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Design)
+--- Forum: Feedback (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Feedback)
+--- Thread: New band logo / sig (/Thread-New-band-logo-sig)
Pages:
1
2
New band logo / sig - Inori - 04-25-2014
Here's the band logo/most of my sig I made today. Just chill, It's from Fullmetal Alchemist, it's not a pentagram. Anything I should fix?
(I made a second edit. I think it's better.)
Spoiler: 1st one:
![[Image: Te4CbJj.png]](http://i.imgur.com/Te4CbJj.png)
Spoiler: 2nd one:
![[Image: QnolToH.png]](http://i.imgur.com/QnolToH.png)
New band logo / sig - Inori - 04-25-2014
Here's the band logo/most of my sig I made today. Just chill, It's from Fullmetal Alchemist, it's not a pentagram. Anything I should fix?
(I made a second edit. I think it's better.)
Spoiler: 1st one:
Spoiler: 2nd one:
RE: New band logo / sig - Yung Lean - 05-01-2014
the 1st is definitely better than second
RE: New band logo / sig - Inori - 05-01-2014
(05-01-2014, 04:50 PM)Clevaro Wrote: the 1st is definitely better than secondWhat do like more about it? I want to adapt a third version.
RE: New band logo / sig - Boomslang - 05-01-2014
1st one seems awesome but the text could be more harmonic with the shape.
RE: New band logo / sig - Yung Lean - 05-01-2014
@Lorax
Bevel Emboss don't really match on it but it's not that bad.
also as RootTheSystem said text could be more harmonic to the shape.
RE: New band logo / sig - masters121 - 05-01-2014
The first image has more detail, or appears to have it. Most everyone prefers art with allot of detail. If you clean up the second image adding more detail I think it would be awsome also. (detail meaning the image not the text)
RE: New band logo / sig - Inori - 05-01-2014
(05-01-2014, 07:46 PM)RootTheSystem Wrote: 1st one seems awesome but the text could be more harmonic with the shape.
(05-01-2014, 08:14 PM)Clevaro Wrote: @Lorax
Bevel Emboss don't really match on it but it's not that bad.
also as RootTheSystem said text could be more harmonic to the shape.
(05-01-2014, 08:30 PM)masters121 Wrote: The first image has more detail, or appears to have it. Most everyone prefers art with allot of detail. If you clean up the second image adding more detail I think it would be awsome also. (detail meaning the image not the text)Thanks for the input, guys! I'll post the third version here
RE: New band logo / sig - masters121 - 05-01-2014
Since this is a logo, I do want to add. I like the text in the second. You want your name easily read, so yes a bit fancy but not so much its difficult for the eye to easily catch and hold that image in the mind. The actual artwork it's self is what you want to use to draw the eye in the words are what you want them to remember.
RE: New band logo / sig - ralf93 - 05-02-2014
how abaout u make a third patch and try fusing the first and the second one.
![[Image: Untitled_1.png]](http://s18.postimg.org/iq96hs17d/Untitled_1.png)
(this is just a quicky, not much cleaned up at lackin details. just trying to prove the point)
or you can just add texture to your first one to add detail to it.