+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Sharing (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Sharing)
+--- Forum: Programs (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Programs)
+--- Thread: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker (/Thread-PasswordsPro-Hash-Cracker)
Pages:
1
2
PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Nefarious - 06-05-2013
PasswordsPro is a program used to crack hashes, MD5, MD4, mybb, ipb, etc.
![[Image: passwordspro.jpg]](http://www.insidepro.com/passwordspro.jpg)
Quote:– 7 types of attacks for recovering passwords to hashes.
– Maximum number of hashes in the licensed version reaches 10 millions.
– Comfortable and quick handling of large hash lists.
– Recovery of passwords of up to 127-characters length long.
– Recovery of passwords for to incomplete hashes of any type.
– Recovery of passwords in Unicode.
– Support for third-party developer's hashing modules.
– Support for using plugins.
– Editing user hashes and other data.
– Adding hashes to the list from a text file using a dialog window or clipboard.
– Copying hashes and found passwords to clipboard.
– Exporting hashes to text or HTML file.
– Searchable list of users with hashes.
– Checking current password against all or selected users on the list.
– Verifying user hashes and their passwords.
– Automatic accumulation of found passwords in the file "PasswordsPro.dic".
– Sorting hash list.
– Exporting hashes with found passwords in the format common for the InsidePro Software forum.
– Support for the "hidden" operating mode – when the program doesn't appear on the taskbar.
You can download it here.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Empty - 06-06-2013
Thanks for sharing this kirito. I have been looking for it.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Kinanizer - 07-01-2013
Thanks for the share. Also if anyone asks for a virus scan, don't put one up.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Sirius - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:00 PM)Kinanizer Wrote: Thanks for the share. Also if anyone asks for a virus scan, don't put one up.
Could I ask why?
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Kinanizer - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:07 PM)๖ۣۣۜۜHawk Wrote: Could I ask why?
Yes, I don't believe S. Elites should have to post virus scans. It was a point I used to preach back when I was active on the AF.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Sirius - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:17 PM)Kinanizer Wrote: Yes, I don't believe S. Elites should have to post virus scans. It was a point I used to preach back when I was active on the AF.
They should post virus-scan because everyone can be S. Elite as it's free.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Versace - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:17 PM)Kinanizer Wrote: Yes, I don't believe S. Elites should have to post virus scans. It was a point I used to preach back when I was active on the AF.
So S.Elite should be completely trusted with their downloads?
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Kinanizer - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:20 PM)๖ۣۣۜۜHawk Wrote: They should post virus-scan because everyone can be S. Elite as it's free.
(07-01-2013, 09:21 PM)Jae Wrote: So S.Elite should be completely trusted with their downloads?
S. Elite is not free, it takes a long time to achieve. By the point that you have earned it people will know whether or not to trust you.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Sirius - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:23 PM)Kinanizer Wrote: S. Elite is not free, it takes a long time to achieve. By the point that you have earned it people will know whether or not to trust you.
It takes time to achieve, but it's still free, everyone can scam such as staffs too, i've experienced admins of forums have fucked up things, and they still don't need to post virus-scans?
Everyone needs to, fair enough.
RE: PasswordsPro Hash Cracker - Kinanizer - 07-01-2013
(07-01-2013, 09:25 PM)๖ۣۣۜۜHawk Wrote: It takes time to achieve, but it's still free, everyone can scam such as staffs too, i've experienced admins of forums have fucked up things, and they still don't need to post virus-scans?
Everyone needs to, fair enough.
I don't see why, this forum has been around for quite some time. The admin has established himself as trustworthy, and so has Kirito. I see no reason for distrust.