+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Inner Peace (/Thread-Inner-Peace)
Pages:
1
2
Inner Peace - darkv0id - 12-13-2012
First thing before I start this article I would like to say I am no guru. I am a normal guy who strives for inner peace.
Inner Peace:
I bet everyone has heard of this term. What does it even mean? Is it possible?
Inner peace (in my opinion) is to have a clear conscious and mind and to be relaxed. This will help with learning, thinking, loving, and life in general.
To achieve inner peace you must first work out the issues your life, learn to look at a different perspective and try to see the big picture in life.
Try meditation, just close your eyes and clear out your thoughts by focusing on your breathing. Tea helps to.
Enjoy.
RE: Inner Peace - LightX - 12-13-2012
Peppermint tea for the win!
RE: Inner Peace - The Real Slim Shady - 12-13-2012
sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
RE: Inner Peace - darkv0id - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 01:47 AM)LightX Wrote: Peppermint tea for the win!
YES
(12-13-2012, 02:09 AM)Geoff Wrote: sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
This is an open discussion. The short statement I made about my views was meant for others to discuss and express their own. Obviously your foolish mind cannot comprehend that.
RE: Inner Peace - LightX - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 02:09 AM)Geoff Wrote: sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
I find it informative. If you dont, just dont do it. But I have realized that you always post negative things on Dark's posts...Do you have something against him?
RE: Inner Peace - The Real Slim Shady - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 02:17 AM)LightX Wrote:(12-13-2012, 02:09 AM)Geoff Wrote: sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
I find it informative. If you dont, just dont do it. But I have realized that you always post negative things on Dark's posts...Do you have something against him?
Ive posted on 3 of his threads now. 1 positive, 2 negative? I was honest in 1, his manifesto i found to be corny. And i feel this thread was just low quality. People have written entire books on meditation and this "article" was could be summarized with "close your eyes and focus on your breathing". My response to this thread wasnt meant to be completely negative, as i stated he could do better with it. The assumption being (i thought) that he should put more effort into it).
if you consider 2 negative posts on 2 of his threads as "always", well... i dont even know where to begin with that logic. I have/had nothing against him. But im not gonna kiss any ones ass if they post LQ shit; even if they are respected members of the forum. Thats just me.
Ill also add that my first response was because i understood this to be an article. articles are generally, longer, informative pieces of writing. It appears it was meant to be an open discussion which makes it not so much an article, and thus no need to expand upon it. I suspect it was just a poor choice of words in the original post.
RE: Inner Peace - darkv0id - 12-13-2012
Ah, you spontaneously added a positive response after you saw Light's post. If I wanted to right an article on meditation it would be so much more in depth as I have read countless books on it and have gone to meditation seminars. I suggest finding more about the meaning behind a post before degrading it.
RE: Inner Peace - LightX - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 02:38 AM)Geoff Wrote:(12-13-2012, 02:17 AM)LightX Wrote:(12-13-2012, 02:09 AM)Geoff Wrote: sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
I find it informative. If you dont, just dont do it. But I have realized that you always post negative things on Dark's posts...Do you have something against him?
Ive posted on 3 of his threads now. 1 positive, 2 negative? I was honest in 1, his manifesto i found to be corny. And i feel this thread was just low quality. People have written entire books on meditation and this "article" was could be summarized with "close your eyes and focus on your breathing". My response to this thread wasnt meant to be completely negative, as i stated he could do better with it. The assumption being (i thought) that he should put more effort into it).
if you consider 2 negative posts on 2 of his threads as "always", well... i dont even know where to begin with that logic. I have/had nothing against him. But im not gonna kiss any ones ass if they post LQ shit; even if they are respected members of the forum. Thats just me.
Ill also add that my first response was because i understood this to be an article. articles are generally, longer, informative pieces of writing. It appears it was meant to be an open discussion which makes it not so much an article, and thus no need to expand upon it. I suspect it was just a poor choice of words in the original post.
Okay, well I remember seing more than 2 negative posts on his threads, maybe i just thought it was you. Sorry for mistaking you, but he did post it to share. There is no set criteria that he needs to post nor should there be. He was trying to help us out.
RE: Inner Peace - darkv0id - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 02:38 AM)Geoff Wrote:But one thing I do respect is the expression of honest opinion. I suggest asking questions instead of making comments that one may find offensive. Every person deserves to be respected the same way in this forum. And I am glad to see that my status does not bother you. I agree I could spend more time on the production of such posts. But there are better and more appropriate ways of phrasing opinions.(12-13-2012, 02:17 AM)LightX Wrote:(12-13-2012, 02:09 AM)Geoff Wrote: sorry but i dont know how you can call this an article... or even informative. you can do better.
I find it informative. If you dont, just dont do it. But I have realized that you always post negative things on Dark's posts...Do you have something against him?
Ive posted on 3 of his threads now. 1 positive, 2 negative? I was honest in 1, his manifesto i found to be corny. And i feel this thread was just low quality. People have written entire books on meditation and this "article" was could be summarized with "close your eyes and focus on your breathing". My response to this thread wasnt meant to be completely negative, as i stated he could do better with it. The assumption being (i thought) that he should put more effort into it).
if you consider 2 negative posts on 2 of his threads as "always", well... i dont even know where to begin with that logic. I have/had nothing against him. But im not gonna kiss any ones ass if they post LQ shit; even if they are respected members of the forum. Thats just me.
Ill also add that my first response was because i understood this to be an article. articles are generally, longer, informative pieces of writing. It appears it was meant to be an open discussion which makes it not so much an article, and thus no need to expand upon it. I suspect it was just a poor choice of words in the original post.
RE: Inner Peace - The Real Slim Shady - 12-13-2012
(12-13-2012, 01:41 AM)darkv0id Wrote: First thing before I start this article
(12-13-2012, 02:50 AM)darkv0id Wrote: I suggest finding more about the meaning behind a post before degrading it.
You posted stating this was an article. Which is why i degraded it as an article.
(12-13-2012, 02:50 AM)darkv0id Wrote: Ah, you spontaneously added a positive response after you saw Light's post.
As for my positive response... There was ~3 minutes between Lights post and my response to your other thread. I dont sit there refreshing the new posts list, and i dont subscribe to threds. I did not have the time to see, read that response and then load and respond to your other thread, showing that I had actually taken the time to read and check over the site you linked. I assure you its not the case lol. That positive response was soley because you posted a great link.
Do we really need to continue this? Ive got nothing against you. I just post shit as i see it. If that means we have a problem then so be it... but thats just makes shit more complicated.