+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+--- Thread: Rating Of HC (/Thread-Rating-Of-HC)
Pages:
1
2
Rating Of HC - Alienbablu - 06-02-2012
Out of 5-star Rating how many stars would U like to give HC ?
RE: Rating Of HC - #Unkn0wn - 06-02-2012
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999/5
That's Mine <3
RE: Rating Of HC - Snipa - 06-02-2012
moved to open discussions
and im sure you will get 5/5 from all staff and from many more members
RE: Rating Of HC - PIllowHax - 06-02-2012
42/1 Amazing forum. Keep it up
RE: Rating Of HC - DaPaus - 06-02-2012
5/5 HC is my home on the internet!
RE: Rating Of HC - Mediocrity_mybb_import6293 - 06-03-2012
(06-02-2012, 05:27 PM)Alienbablu Wrote: Out of 5-star Rating how many stars would U like to give HC ?
Hmm rating system i see . ?
i beleive you should have created a poll for this thread
with a few relitively small but effective questions rather than just give hc and overall rating of 5. ? however i would suggest that hc would recieve a 4 from me
Why not a 5
Simple because i am a fan of the old hc , it has nothing do do with 1llusion taking over the administrative side of the website its simply because i learnt alot from the old hc and the old members they were allot more friendly and genuine nowadays the only new members you see is those who come for 10 minuetes demand you hack a website for them and then leave they dont leave any trail of existence in Hq posts nor threads .
I`m sure many people would agree with me that the older Hc was the Bollox and the HQ posts and content were just awesome users really learnt alot from other users like i said nowadays the site is filled with 30% geniuene wanabe learners 40% Vetran coders/hackers/GFXers and legends and the other 30% is just low life wannabe hacking skids rejected from That other Hacking fourm.
MY OPTION please dont be offended.
RE: Rating Of HC - HrDe - 06-03-2012
my rate 1 because HC always number 1 Ethical Hacking Forum.
RE: Rating Of HC - Dawnc0re - 06-03-2012
6 out of 5,
But the old HQers are missing
It's an awesome community for everybody. Hackers or no hackers. There's something for everyone!
RE: Rating Of HC - Coder-san - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 12:34 AM)Mediocrity Wrote:(06-02-2012, 05:27 PM)Alienbablu Wrote: Out of 5-star Rating how many stars would U like to give HC ?
Hmm rating system i see . ?
i beleive you should have created a poll for this thread
with a few relitively small but effective questions rather than just give hc and overall rating of 5. ? however i would suggest that hc would recieve a 4 from me
Why not a 5
Simple because i am a fan of the old hc , it has nothing do do with 1llusion taking over the administrative side of the website its simply because i learnt alot from the old hc and the old members they were allot more friendly and genuine nowadays the only new members you see is those who come for 10 minuetes demand you hack a website for them and then leave they dont leave any trail of existence in Hq posts nor threads .
I`m sure many people would agree with me that the older Hc was the Bollox and the HQ posts and content were just awesome users really learnt alot from other users like i said nowadays the site is filled with 30% geniuene wanabe learners 40% Vetran coders/hackers/GFXers and legends and the other 30% is just low life wannabe hacking skids rejected from That other Hacking fourm.
MY OPTION please dont be offended.
This is still the same HC, at least the idea is still the same. To be the best ethical hacking forum.
Our administration (Sage and mine) was more autocratic, we literally forced HQ posts. But as a result were losing on the activity side.
The new administration of 1llusion and team are more democratic, very friendly, welcome suggestions more than we did. But as a result of being too friendly, we are losing some quality. The forum is more active however.
Basic difference is we were shaping the members according to how we wanted HC to be, and 1llusion and team are shaping the forum how the members want it to be.
I would agree to your rating of 4/5, and insist that in order to get 5 a proper balance must be found between both the older and the newer administration style.
This is completely my opinion, you may not agree to it.
RE: Rating Of HC - Dawnc0re - 06-03-2012
(06-03-2012, 04:10 AM)Coder-san Wrote: This is still the same HC, at least the idea is still the same. To be the best ethical hacking forum.
Our administration (Sage and mine) was more autocratic, we literally forced HQ posts. But as a result were losing on the activity side.
The new administration of 1llusion and team are more democratic, very friendly, welcome suggestions more than we did. But as a result of being too friendly, we are losing some quality. The forum is more active however.
Basic difference is we were shaping the members according to how we wanted HC to be, and 1llusion and team are shaping the forum how the members want it to be.
I would agree to your rating of 4/5, and insist that in order to get 5 a proper balance must be found between both the older and the newer administration style.
This is completely my opinion, you may not agree to it.
Yeah, that's kinda true. Members have more benefits now and it's better for everyone, except the Quality Content on the forum. Whenever there's a HQ Thread now, it gets smaller amount of attention then the "D00s3rz","By Anon", etc related things.
But, we can fix that. It is the best ethical hacking forum, and it will be.