Sinisterly
Leak BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - Printable Version

+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: Hacking (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking)
+--- Forum: Hacking Tools (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Hacking-Tools)
+--- Thread: Leak BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked (/Thread-Leak-BlackNET-3-5-1-cracked)

Pages: 1 2

BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - blackhatrussia0x0x - 06-11-2021

[center][Image: 1.png][/center]


[center]BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked


Free advanced and modern Windows botnet with a nice and secure PHP panel built using VB.NET.

[/center]



==========
[center]


About BlackNET
Free advanced and modern Windows botnet with a nice and secure PHP panel built using VB.NET.

this botnet controller comes with a lot of features and the most secure panel for free


What You Can Do
Upload File
Open Webpage [Visiable, Hidden]
Show MessageBox
Take Screenshot
Steal Firefox Cookies
Steal Saved Passwords [ Chrome, Firefox ]
Steal Chrome Cookies
Steal Chrome History
Execute Scripts
Execute Shell Commands
Keylogger
Computer operations [ Restart, Shutdown, Logout ]
Uninstall Client
Move Client
Blacklist Client
Close Client
[Image: Screenshot-2.png]
Requirements
PHP >= 7.0
NET Framework

How to Install PHP Panel
Clone the Repo
Compress BlackNET panel folder and upload it to your hosting
Create a database with any name you want
Change the database information and app path in config/config.sample.php
Rename config.sample.php to config.php
Change files and folders permission to 777 [ Uploads Folder]
Make Sure that all DLLs are included in Plugins Folder
Go to install.php to create the botnet tables automatically
Enable a Cron Job for ping.php and remove.php

Update notice
If you have BlackNET installed you need
Upload the new files
Run update.php

What's New
Code:
v3.5.2

1. Added Queue System to handle commands
2. Added NordVPN Stealer
3. Added Clipboard Stealer
4. Cleaner, Faster, Better Connection
5. Fixed Socket Issues
6. Update BlackUpload to 1.5
7. Update PHP Mailer
8. Removes some useless functions
9. Bugs Fixes


ICQ:653580170
Whatsapp +79017473945
jabber: russianhackerclub@Jabber.ru

Link removed- Staff.

[/center]


blacknet botnet github,blacknet botnet download,blacknet php botnet,blanket stealer,how to use blacknet botnet,how to config blacknet botnet,how to setup blacknet botnet

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - mothered - 06-11-2021

Be sure to provide an online virus scan report at your earliest convenience.

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - d4ggm4sk - 06-11-2021

you got the scource code for this man? im not going to download the botnet,
but I would be willing to look at the scource code for "educational purposes" *rubs hands together*

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - fritz - 06-13-2021

48 hours have passed and still no VT, smells fishy

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - mothered - 06-13-2021

(06-13-2021, 12:04 PM)fritz Wrote: 48 hours have passed and still no VT, smells fishy
The OP hasn't been active for over 48 hours.

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - fritz - 06-13-2021

(06-13-2021, 12:18 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-13-2021, 12:04 PM)fritz Wrote: 48 hours have passed and still no VT, smells fishy
The OP hasn't been active for over 48 hours.
Having a sketchy self installer when source files are publicly available is always suspicious.
As expected, after installing it it adds a file to startup (C:\Users\CurrentUser\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\): Payload.exe [40/70]

EDIT: As a VT scan is required, wouldn't it be better to remove download links if not provided after a certain period, even if the user doesn't come back online? Otherwise it will be really easy to spam with infected links for new users, just need to not log-in again ever...

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - mothered - 06-13-2021

(06-13-2021, 01:31 PM)fritz Wrote: As a VT scan is required, wouldn't it be better to remove download links if not provided after a certain period, even if the user doesn't come back online?
It's not how It works.

What If the member legitimately forgot to provide the report, but the file Is clean and he/she Is Inactive only for a short period? We'd be removing links that're perfectly fine to begin with.

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - fritz - 06-13-2021

(06-13-2021, 04:38 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-13-2021, 01:31 PM)fritz Wrote: As a VT scan is required, wouldn't it be better to remove download links if not provided after a certain period, even if the user doesn't come back online?
It's not how It works.

What If the member legitimately forgot to provide the report, but the file Is clean and he/she Is Inactive only for a short period? We'd be removing links that're perfectly fine to begin with.
Well if a VT report wasn't originally provided the thread violates the rules anyway!

EDIT: Looks like you forgot to remove that link by the way

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - ConcernedCitizen - 06-13-2021

(06-13-2021, 04:38 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-13-2021, 01:31 PM)fritz Wrote: As a VT scan is required, wouldn't it be better to remove download links if not provided after a certain period, even if the user doesn't come back online?
It's not how It works.

What If the member legitimately forgot to provide the report, but the file Is clean and he/she Is Inactive only for a short period? We'd be removing links that're perfectly fine to begin with.
The link should be removed after 24 hours of not being validated, then the user should be notified. It can and should be how it works.
What good are rules when no one follows them?
  • Don't intentionally infect users
  • Hacking Another User [50%]
Should be 100% ban for intentionally violating these rules of conduct.

RE: BlackNET 3.5.1 cracked - Oni - 06-14-2021

(06-13-2021, 09:42 PM)vittring Wrote:
(06-13-2021, 04:38 PM)mothered Wrote:
(06-13-2021, 01:31 PM)fritz Wrote: As a VT scan is required, wouldn't it be better to remove download links if not provided after a certain period, even if the user doesn't come back online?
It's not how It works.

What If the member legitimately forgot to provide the report, but the file Is clean and he/she Is Inactive only for a short period? We'd be removing links that're perfectly fine to begin with.
The link should be removed after 24 hours of not being validated, then the user should be notified. It can and should be how it works.
What good are rules when no one follows them?
  • Don't intentionally infect users
  • Hacking Another User [50%]
Should be 100% ban for intentionally violating these rules of conduct.

I trust @mothered and @Jiggly's judgement and generally we issue a permanent ban for any intentional violations. Some people repost/reshare, so I don't always treat every case the same.

Due to the nature of some of the files people upload, false positives exist and we recommend people exercise caution when executing files from any origin. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.