![]() |
|
Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Printable Version +- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly) +-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General) +--- Forum: World News (https://sinister.ly/Forum-World-News) +--- Thread: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s (/Thread-Engine-Explosion-Grounds-Boeing-777s) |
Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Oni - 02-22-2021 Wouldn't recommend travelling anyways, but... Quote:Federal aviation regulators are ordering United Airlines to step up inspections of all Boeing 777s equipped with the type of engine that suffered a catastrophic failure over Denver on Saturday. United said it is temporarily removing those aircraft from service. Read More: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united-airlines-engine-explosion-boeing-777-inspections/ RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - mothered - 02-22-2021 I've just viewed a more detailed video here. Quote:Wouldn't recommend travelling anywaysYou got that right. Personally, I'd wait a year at the minimum before travelling Interstate or abroad- but only If conditions are deemed safe to do so. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - fsociety - 02-22-2021 (02-22-2021, 09:47 AM)mothered Wrote: I've just viewed a more detailed video here. i got like to get in plane because if plane crashs and goes down only 1% chance to survice... i prefer good train instead of plane..crashing in train is ok .. but if plane goes down it really fucking force... when crash.. ========== i remember i was in my college go to library , i and my friend when into elevator ...and suddenly elevator get down suddenly that was fucking expericene .. when lift goes down suddenly...in short moment it give massive force than think about plane force when fall from sky... RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - mothered - 02-22-2021 (02-22-2021, 09:54 AM)fsociety Wrote: i got like to get in plane because if plane crashs and goes down only 1% chance to survice... i prefer good train instead of plane..crashing in train is ok .. but if plane goes down it really fucking force... when crash..I certainly agree with planes. It's not like a car, whereby you can pull over to the side of the road If there's mechanical failure. Once a plane loses all power, that's the end of everyone on board. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Jiggly - 02-22-2021 (02-22-2021, 09:54 AM)fsociety Wrote:(02-22-2021, 09:47 AM)mothered Wrote: I've just viewed a more detailed video here. (02-22-2021, 11:14 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-22-2021, 09:54 AM)fsociety Wrote: i got like to get in plane because if plane crashs and goes down only 1% chance to survice... i prefer good train instead of plane..crashing in train is ok .. but if plane goes down it really fucking force... when crash..I certainly agree with planes. Both of what you two have said is totally true. If something goes wrong with a plane, it's serious business, as there is no easy way to bail out. However, you are SIGNIFICANTLY more likely to die in a train incident or car crash, or just waiting at the airport, than you ever are to die in a plane crash. There's a reason any and all plane incidents hit our news - plane crashes are so rare compared to the number of people travelling and journeys made. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - mothered - 02-23-2021 (02-22-2021, 10:05 PM)Jiggly Wrote: If something goes wrong with a plane, it's serious business, as there is no easy way to bail out.Absolutely. Rarely do you hear of survivors after a serious plane crash. (02-22-2021, 10:05 PM)Jiggly Wrote: However, you are SIGNIFICANTLY more likely to die in a train incident or car crash, or just waiting at the airport, than you ever are to die in a plane crash. There's a reason any and all plane incidents hit our news - plane crashes are so rare compared to the number of people travelling and journeys made.You also need to consider that there's around 24,000 commercial aircraft globally, with 5,000 (on average) actively flying at a given period. When comparing that to 1.4 billion cars worldwide, motor vehicle crashes are significantly more due to the said figures. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Jiggly - 02-23-2021 (02-23-2021, 03:12 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-22-2021, 10:05 PM)Jiggly Wrote: If something goes wrong with a plane, it's serious business, as there is no easy way to bail out.Absolutely. This is true! There's some scale, that I can't recall the name of, that looks into how "dangerous" any given activity is. The rating from the scale given is based on two things: the risk and the frequency with which that activity is done. A higher frequency equates to a higher rating given for danger. I think it would certainly apply here. Generally, it is said that there is a 1 in 11 million chance of dying via a plane crash. However, as with any statistic, I take it with a pinch of salt. That being said, I've probably made over 50 flights in my lifetime thus far. I wonder how much those figures change for frequent flyers. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Oni - 02-24-2021 Supposedly the explosion was caused by "metal fatigue" on one of the fan blades: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united-flight-328-engine-explosion-denver-metal-fatigue/ RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - mothered - 02-24-2021 (02-23-2021, 10:16 PM)Jiggly Wrote: There's some scale, that I can't recall the name of, that looks into how "dangerous" any given activity is. The rating from the scale given is based on two things: the risk and the frequency with which that activity is done. A higher frequency equates to a higher rating given for danger.It'll be Interesting to read the overall rating, particularly the equation used to calculate the risk(s) against the given activity. I'll hit a Google search later this evening. (02-23-2021, 10:16 PM)Jiggly Wrote: Generally, it is said that there is a 1 in 11 million chance of dying via a plane crash.Yes, this article Is precisely what you've stated. Whether It's true to Its word, remains to be seen. RE: Engine Explosion Grounds Boeing 777s - Jiggly - 02-24-2021 (02-24-2021, 07:54 AM)mothered Wrote:(02-23-2021, 10:16 PM)Jiggly Wrote: There's some scale, that I can't recall the name of, that looks into how "dangerous" any given activity is. The rating from the scale given is based on two things: the risk and the frequency with which that activity is done. A higher frequency equates to a higher rating given for danger.It'll be Interesting to read the overall rating, particularly the equation used to calculate the risk(s) against the given activity. Spot on! xD I wish I could recall what the scale is called. It was a good read. It technically meant things like washing the dishes were more dangerous than a comet crashing into the earth, based on the frequency of either activity occurring. |