+- Sinisterly (https://sinister.ly)
+-- Forum: General (https://sinister.ly/Forum-General)
+--- Forum: The Lounge (https://sinister.ly/Forum-The-Lounge)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussion (https://sinister.ly/Forum-Serious-Discussion)
+---- Thread: Homosexuality [DEBATE] (/Thread-Homosexuality-DEBATE)
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - laininthewired - 04-15-2021
(04-15-2021, 01:24 AM)runyservices Wrote: the real question would be what do homosexuals contribute to the betterment of society?I mean does it matter? Da vinci was a homosexual and he contributed profound ideas in art and science. Sexual orientation does not mean anything really.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - runyservices - 04-15-2021
(04-15-2021, 01:31 AM)ballsinmyface445 Wrote:(04-15-2021, 01:24 AM)runyservices Wrote: the real question would be what do homosexuals contribute to the betterment of society?I mean does it matter? Da vinci was a homosexual and he contributed profound ideas in art and science. Sexual orientation does not mean anything really.
Would it be okay for human race if everyone was a homosexual?
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - laininthewired - 04-15-2021
(04-15-2021, 01:34 AM)runyservices Wrote:Of course not. Homosexuality is not the norm in society, and never will be.(04-15-2021, 01:31 AM)ballsinmyface445 Wrote:(04-15-2021, 01:24 AM)runyservices Wrote: the real question would be what do homosexuals contribute to the betterment of society?I mean does it matter? Da vinci was a homosexual and he contributed profound ideas in art and science. Sexual orientation does not mean anything really.
Would it be okay for human race if everyone was a homosexual?
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - runyservices - 04-15-2021
(04-15-2021, 01:36 AM)ballsinmyface445 Wrote:(04-15-2021, 01:34 AM)runyservices Wrote:Of course not. Homosexuality is not the norm in society, and never will be.(04-15-2021, 01:31 AM)ballsinmyface445 Wrote: I mean does it matter? Da vinci was a homosexual and he contributed profound ideas in art and science. Sexual orientation does not mean anything really.Lately homosexuality has been portrayed as something we should acknowledge as a norm, if we keep doing this in the future it will become a norm and that could affect human race.
Homosexuality is not a natural stand of a human being, you will find that most homosexuals are homosexuals because they have been somehow socialized since babies into loving the same gender.
Would it be okay for human race if everyone was a homosexual?
Lately homosexuality has been portrayed as something we should acknowledge as a norm, if we keep doing this in the future it will become a norm and that could affect human race.
Homosexuality is not a natural stand of a human being, you will find that most homosexuals are homosexuals because they have been somehow socialized since babies into loving the same gender.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - laininthewired - 04-15-2021
(04-15-2021, 01:39 AM)runyservices Wrote:I mean I agree with you to an extent. Homosexuality being prevalent in society is nothing new though.(04-15-2021, 01:36 AM)ballsinmyface445 Wrote:(04-15-2021, 01:34 AM)runyservices Wrote: Lately homosexuality has been portrayed as something we should acknowledge as a norm, if we keep doing this in the future it will become a norm and that could affect human race.Of course not. Homosexuality is not the norm in society, and never will be.
Homosexuality is not a natural stand of a human being, you will find that most homosexuals are homosexuals because they have been somehow socialized since babies into loving the same gender.
Would it be okay for human race if everyone was a homosexual?
Lately homosexuality has been portrayed as something we should acknowledge as a norm, if we keep doing this in the future it will become a norm and that could affect human race.
Homosexuality is not a natural stand of a human being, you will find that most homosexuals are homosexuals because they have been somehow socialized since babies into loving the same gender.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - miso - 04-15-2021
this is my thread now
anyone reading this thrad is a confirmed homosexual
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - echo_blini - 05-20-2021
It's hard not to become emotional when a bad faith actor with clear confirmation bias uses Shapiro style debate tactics to frustrate opposition into losing their bearing and attacking their flustered semantics. The reason OP dropped so many links is because in order for you to make a stance against the epistemological issues in his argument, you have to pick through every one of those articles and exhaustively single out every logical fallacy and inaccuracy in them with cited sources. The goal here is not to be proven, but to bludgeon a particular viewpoint into others and attack their reactions. This is in the realm of a social engineering attack, is malicious, an should not be entertained, but ignored as a bad faith argument.
God, reading that post made my queer blood boil.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - Miamoo - 08-02-2021
Homosexuality is a physiological problem which needs to be treated early when detected. My opinion is it should not be legalized, rather treated to bring them to main stream.
RE: Homosexuality [DEBATE] - AsylantenAnanas - 08-30-2021
i love your arguments. you absolutely share my opinion on that topic. although i have to say that acceptance also is a big factor we should consider.
except for lgbtq+. we dont want and need some weird gender/gender identities that are completely useless and just stupid.